Finding Instantaneous acceleration from a velocity-time graph

Click For Summary
To find instantaneous acceleration from a velocity-time graph at t2 = 31 s, the slope of the tangent line at that point must be calculated. The user attempted various values but did not achieve the correct answer, indicating confusion over the conversion to m/s². They correctly computed average accelerations for different intervals but struggled with the instantaneous value at the corner point. The user concluded that the instantaneous acceleration is not zero and recognized that the slope at the corner is defined. Ultimately, they resolved their confusion regarding the calculation.
MitsuShai
Messages
159
Reaction score
0
Graph: http://s324.photobucket.com/albums/k327/ProtoGirlEXE/?action=view&current=Capture.jpg
What is the instantaneous acceleration at t2 = 31 s?

I know that the instantaneous acceleration is the slope of the tangent of that point and yes I do know I have to convert it to (m/s^2). But I am still not getting the right answers. Here are a list of answers I imputed and they are all wrong:
-.1
0
-2
-1
-1.9
1.9
-.278
-.52

on the first few, I forgot to convert. I used 58/31 the last time...

The question had parts to it, but I don't know if they are necessary to solve this problem...here it is anyways:
A) Compute the average acceleration during the time interval t = 0s to t = 10s. 1.7
B) Compute the average acceleration during the time interval t = 30s to t = 40s. -1.7
C) Compute the average acceleration during the time interval t = 10s to t = 30s. 0
What is the instantaneous acceleration at t1 = 29 s. 0
I already computed this and got them right.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like its either going to be 0 or its going to be at that corner, where the rate of change is not going to be defined.
 
Whitishcube said:
It looks like its either going to be 0 or its going to be at that corner, where the rate of change is not going to be defined.

I put zero and it was wrong and I don't think undefined is an appropriate answer because 30 is exactly at that corner and it has an acceleration, which I used to solve part B with.
 
Graph: http://i324.photobucket.com/albums/k327/ProtoGirlEXE/Capture.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
nevermind I got it now.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K