Finding Maclaurin Error < 0.0001 for f(x)=cos(2x) at x=0.6

  • Thread starter Thread starter kenny87
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Errors Maclaurin
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the degree of the Maclaurin polynomial necessary for the approximation of f(x) = cos(2x) at x = 0.6, ensuring the error remains below 0.0001. The error term Rn(0.6) is defined as Rn(0.6) = (f^(n+1)(z) / (n+1)!) * (0.6)^(n+1). Participants emphasize the need to find the (n+1)th derivative of f at z and solve the inequality Rn(0.6) < 0.0001 to find the required degree n. A trial-and-error method is suggested for calculating successive Maclaurin series expansions until the desired accuracy is achieved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maclaurin series and Taylor series expansions
  • Knowledge of calculus, specifically derivatives and error analysis
  • Familiarity with the function f(x) = cos(2x)
  • Ability to solve inequalities involving factorials and polynomial terms
NEXT STEPS
  • Calculate the derivatives of f(x) = cos(2x) to find f^(n+1)(0)
  • Learn about error bounds in Taylor series approximations
  • Practice solving inequalities involving factorials and polynomial expressions
  • Explore numerical methods for approximating functions and their errors
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians focusing on series approximations, and anyone interested in numerical analysis and error estimation techniques.

kenny87
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Here's the problem:

Determine the degree of Maclaurin polynomial required for the error to be less than .0001 if f(x)=cos(2x) and you are approximating f(0.6)

I really don't know what I am doing. Here's what I've tried to do:

Rn(.6) = ( (f^(n+1)(z)) / (n+1)! ) (.6)^(n+1)

I don't know where to go from here...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You must find the form of f^{n+1}(0) first, then substitute it to Rn(0.6).
Solve the inequation : Rn(0.6) < 0.001 for n.
n is the required degree of Maclaurin polynomial for the given error.
 
Where did this come from: Rn(.6) = ( (f^(n+1)(z)) / (n+1)! ) (.6)^(n+1) ?

I would do this by trial and error, i.e calculating a larger and larger Maclaurin series expansion of cos (2x) until f(0.6) is where you need it to be.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K