Finding magnetic field from magnetic force / semielliptical conductor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the magnetic field and forces related to a charge in a magnetic field and a semi-elliptical conductor. For the charge, the velocity is derived as v(t) = (2at + 2b, 2b, 0), and the magnetic force is calculated using the Lorentz force law, though there is uncertainty about the additional magnetic field when the magnetic force vector changes. The participants discuss the application of the Biot-Savart law for the semi-elliptical conductor, emphasizing the need to express the integral for the magnetic field at the origin without solving it. Clarifications are sought about the center of the semi-elliptical conductor and the simplifications that might apply to the problem. The conversation highlights the complexities of applying theoretical principles to practical scenarios in electromagnetism.
awelex
Messages
44
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


1) A charge Q is placed in a uniform magnetic field of magnitude a that proceeds in the -z direction. Its displacement is given by r(t) = (at^2+bt, 2bt, a).
a) Find v(t).
c) Find the magnetic force exerted on the charge at time t=t'.
d) Now the magnetic field at time t' has changed; a magnetic force vector F = (0, -ab, 4bt^2) is now exerted by the field on the charge in addition to the original magnetic force vector. If the charge has the same velocity, and y-component of B = 0, what's the additional magnetic field?

2) A semi-elliptical conductor (semimajor axis a, semiminor axis b) is centered at the origin in the xy-plane. The conductor carries a current I a CCW direction.

Write the integral expression for the magnetic field vector due to the semi-elliptical conductor at the origin.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


1)
a) v(t) = r'(t) = (2at + 2b, 2b, 0)

c) not sure about this one:
F = Q * v(t') * B * sin(theta); but theta = 90 degrees because B goes in -z direction and v(t) doesn't have a z component. Therefore,
F = Q * sqrt( (2at+2b)^2 + 4b^2 ) * a

d) This is the one I have no idea how to solve. I don't even know how to start. Do I have to use the law of Biot and Savart to find the magnetic field? If so, how? I assume another possibility would be to find the "inverse cross product" (if such a thing exists) of the given force vector - but I was told by our professor we don't have to do that. Any hints?


2) We only have to express the integral, not solve it. This is how far I got:

dB = mu0 / (4*Pi) * (I * dl) / r^2, because dl is perpendicular to the "radius" of the ellipse at any point. But the radius itself varies. How do I express that? I looked up the the equations of an ellipse in polar coordinates, so I assume I could use that. But I'd rather understand what exactly I'm doing than simply plugging in equations from the internet.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1.d)biot and savart is for current distributions; why use that?

Go on with the lorentz force law. Vectorially add the magnetic forces and equate to (qv)X(B_net). You'll get 3 equations each along x,y and z directions. Solve them and get your field B.

regarding 2, what is the centre of a semi-elliptical conductor?
 
Thanks for your answer, saubhik. For 1d) I assumed that's how I have to solve it, but I was specifically told not to - there must be some property that simplifies the problem.

The center of the semi-elliptical conductor is the the point midway between the two foci.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top