MHB Finding Matrix D Without Calculating P Inverse: Help Appreciated!

  • Thread starter Thread starter tomc612
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Matrix
tomc612
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi,
got a question I'm stuck on..

Write down a matrix P which will diagonalise A and write down the corresponding
diagonal matrix D, where D = P^-􀀀1AP. You do not have to calculate P^-1


Ive got all the eigenvalues and eigenvectors for A, and thus have the Matrix P, which has a determinant of -12 and thus P^-1 exists.

Question is how to do you determine D without calculating the inverse of P?

Any help appreciated

Tom
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tomc612 said:
Hi,
got a question I'm stuck on..

Write down a matrix P which will diagonalise A and write down the corresponding
diagonal matrix D, where D = P^-􀀀1AP. You do not have to calculate P^-1


Ive got all the eigenvalues and eigenvectors for A, and thus have the Matrix P, which has a determinant of -12 and thus P^-1 exists.

Question is how to do you determine D without calculating the inverse of P?

Any help appreciated

Tom
The entries on the main diagonal of $D$ are the eigenvalues of $A$. All the other entries in $D$ are zeros.

When you wrote down the matrix $P$, its columns were the eigenvectors of $A$ (in some order). When you write the diagonal elements of $D$, you should use the corresponding eigenvalues in the same order.
 
I am surprised that tomc612 would be given a problem like this if he had not already learned everything Opalg said!
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top