MHB Finding n number of socks given a probability

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jameson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a probability problem involving socks, specifically determining the total number of socks (n) given that the probability of randomly selecting two red socks from three is 0.5. The initial approach using combinations led to the incorrect equation n(n-1)=3, resulting in non-integer solutions. A correction pointed out that the proper formulation should yield n(n-1)=12, which has integer roots. The error stemmed from an incorrect cancellation during the calculations, highlighting the importance of careful mathematical manipulation. The participants express appreciation for collaborative problem-solving in mathematics.
Jameson
Insights Author
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,533
Reaction score
13
I have checked and rechecked my thought process, but can't seem to figure this one out.

There are n socks, 3 of which are red. What is the value of n if 2 of the socks are chosen at random, the probability that both are red is 0.5?

This seems like a fairly straightforward combination problem. Here's my work.

[math]\left( \frac{\binom{3}{2}}{\binom{n}{2}}=\frac{1}{2} \right) \rightarrow \left( \frac{3}{\frac{n(n-1)}{2!}}=\frac{1}{2} \right) \rightarrow n(n-1)=3[/math]

Solving that quadratic leads to non-integer solutions so we have a problem. Where's my error?

EDIT: Even approaching it another way I get the same thing. Let's not use combinations. Instead say the probability of choosing 1 red sock is [math]\frac{3}{n}[/math] and after that the probability of choosing another red sock is [math]\frac{2}{n-1}[/math]. We get the same thing [math]\frac{3}{n} \frac{2}{n-1} = \frac{1}{2}[/math]
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Your problem is here:

[math]\left( \frac{\binom{3}{2}}{\binom{n}{2}}=\frac{1}{2} \right) \rightarrow \left( \frac{3}{\frac{n(n-1)}{2!}}=\frac{1}{2} \right) \rightarrow n(n-1)=3[/math]

This instead leads to the quadratic:

$n(n-1)=12$

which has integral roots.
 
Hmm, I appreciate the correction but I still can't spot the error in my work. If the math from my OP you quoted has 3 expressions, in which expression did I first make a mistake. I just can't see it (Headbang).
 
We have:

$\displaystyle\frac{3}{\frac{n(n-1)}{2}}=\frac{1}{2}$

Next, on the left, we may bring the 2 in the denominator up top as follows:

$\displaystyle\frac{6}{n(n-1)}=\frac{1}{2}$

Cross-multiply:

$n(n-1)=12$

You were essentially trying to use:

$\displaystyle \frac{1}{\frac{1}{2}}=\frac{1}{2}$

and this led to the RHS of you quadratic being 1/4 what it should be.
 
I got it now. Thank you MarkFL! I was doing some kind of incorrect cancellation with the two in a numerator and denominator across the equals sign instead of cross-multiplying.

This kind of small thing can be maddening! Thanks again. :)
 
Very glad to offer a second pair of eyes! (Smile)
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top