MHB Finding n number of socks given a probability

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jameson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
Jameson
Insights Author
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,533
Reaction score
13
I have checked and rechecked my thought process, but can't seem to figure this one out.

There are n socks, 3 of which are red. What is the value of n if 2 of the socks are chosen at random, the probability that both are red is 0.5?

This seems like a fairly straightforward combination problem. Here's my work.

[math]\left( \frac{\binom{3}{2}}{\binom{n}{2}}=\frac{1}{2} \right) \rightarrow \left( \frac{3}{\frac{n(n-1)}{2!}}=\frac{1}{2} \right) \rightarrow n(n-1)=3[/math]

Solving that quadratic leads to non-integer solutions so we have a problem. Where's my error?

EDIT: Even approaching it another way I get the same thing. Let's not use combinations. Instead say the probability of choosing 1 red sock is [math]\frac{3}{n}[/math] and after that the probability of choosing another red sock is [math]\frac{2}{n-1}[/math]. We get the same thing [math]\frac{3}{n} \frac{2}{n-1} = \frac{1}{2}[/math]
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Your problem is here:

[math]\left( \frac{\binom{3}{2}}{\binom{n}{2}}=\frac{1}{2} \right) \rightarrow \left( \frac{3}{\frac{n(n-1)}{2!}}=\frac{1}{2} \right) \rightarrow n(n-1)=3[/math]

This instead leads to the quadratic:

$n(n-1)=12$

which has integral roots.
 
Hmm, I appreciate the correction but I still can't spot the error in my work. If the math from my OP you quoted has 3 expressions, in which expression did I first make a mistake. I just can't see it (Headbang).
 
We have:

$\displaystyle\frac{3}{\frac{n(n-1)}{2}}=\frac{1}{2}$

Next, on the left, we may bring the 2 in the denominator up top as follows:

$\displaystyle\frac{6}{n(n-1)}=\frac{1}{2}$

Cross-multiply:

$n(n-1)=12$

You were essentially trying to use:

$\displaystyle \frac{1}{\frac{1}{2}}=\frac{1}{2}$

and this led to the RHS of you quadratic being 1/4 what it should be.
 
I got it now. Thank you MarkFL! I was doing some kind of incorrect cancellation with the two in a numerator and denominator across the equals sign instead of cross-multiplying.

This kind of small thing can be maddening! Thanks again. :)
 
Very glad to offer a second pair of eyes! (Smile)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top