What are the steps for solving a circuit using node voltage analysis?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rugerts
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
To solve a circuit using node voltage analysis, start by applying Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) to each node, resulting in n-1 equations for n nodes. It's important to ensure that all equations are independent and correctly transcribed, especially when dealing with current coefficients. In this case, a potential difference between nodes 2 and 3 forms a supernode, allowing for the simplification to just two essential node equations. Using methods like Cramer's Rule can aid in solving the equations effectively. Ultimately, accurate identification of nodes and their relationships is crucial for obtaining correct node voltages.
rugerts
Messages
153
Reaction score
11

Homework Statement


Using node voltage analysis, find the node voltages.

Homework Equations


n-1 Kirchhoff's Current Law equations for n nodes (since ground is a node).

The Attempt at a Solution


IMG-1910.JPG
IMG-1911.JPG

I've tried doing KCL at each node and then getting a fourth equation from a potential difference between nodes 2 and 3. I'm not sure if taking the fourth equation is entirely valid but I do believe I have seen this been done before solving using substitution. I am trying, however, to use Cramer's Rule through a calculator.

Since uploading pictures here always seems to turn out blurry, here's an imgur link: https://imgur.com/Xd8gqRx
 

Attachments

  • IMG-1910.JPG
    IMG-1910.JPG
    33.5 KB · Views: 1,351
  • IMG-1911.JPG
    IMG-1911.JPG
    26.8 KB · Views: 666
Physics news on Phys.org
2 of your equations use the current i, but only second row of the matrix has a coefficient which will multiply by i.
 
  • Like
Likes rugerts
I think you didn't transcribe correctly or forgot some terms when this one got put into the matrx:

Circuit_eq.jpg


And yes you should have 4 independent equations if you want to solve for the 4 unknown variables. It appears that your equations are independent.
 

Attachments

  • Circuit_eq.jpg
    Circuit_eq.jpg
    17.3 KB · Views: 597
scottdave said:
2 of your equations use the current i, but only second row of the matrix has a coefficient which will multiply by i.
Well, it looks like that was the solution because my answers now agree with what the book has. Thank you for the keen eye! I appreciate the help.
 
  • Like
Likes scottdave
Note that nodes V2 and V3 have a fixed potential difference thanks to the voltage source V. Hence, V2 and V3 comprise a supernode, and you have only two essential nodes. The circuit can be solved using just two node equations, (say for V1 and the supernode V2/3).
 
  • Like
Likes scottdave and rugerts
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K