Finding permutations of a stabilizer subgroup of An

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on understanding the concept of a stabilizer subgroup within the context of the symmetric group An. It clarifies that the stabilizer of an element x in a set S, denoted as Stab(x), consists of all elements g in group G that leave x unchanged (gx = x). The example provided uses S3, where the stabilizer of the element 2 includes the permutations that either transpose 1 and 3 or leave all elements fixed. The key takeaway is that the stabilizer does not map elements to 1, as 1 is not an element of S but rather belongs to the group G.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory concepts, specifically stabilizers and symmetric groups.
  • Familiarity with permutation notation and operations in S_n.
  • Knowledge of group actions and their definitions.
  • Basic understanding of mathematical notation and symbols used in group theory.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of stabilizer subgroups in various symmetric groups, particularly S_n.
  • Explore the concept of group actions in more depth, focusing on their implications in group theory.
  • Learn about the relationship between stabilizers and orbits in group actions.
  • Investigate examples of stabilizers in other groups beyond symmetric groups, such as alternating groups.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of abstract algebra, and anyone interested in group theory, particularly those studying symmetric and alternating groups.

goalieplayer
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Alright, I understand what a stabilizer is in a group, and I know how to find the permutations of An for any small integer n, but for a stabilizer, since it just maps every element to 1, would all permutations just be (1 2) (1 3) ... (1 n) for An?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you may be confused about what the stabilizer is.

Suppose you have
  1. a group G
  2. a set S (this set is not necessarily a group, it is just a bunch of elements)

There need be no connection between the elements of S and the elements of G. That is, S is just a collection of elements that can be entirely distinct from the elements of G.

An action of G on S is a map from G \times S \rightarrow S. (We also place two requirements on the behavior of this map, but just ignore this for the moment). In other words, "G acts on S" means that given any g \in G and any x \in S we can "apply" g to x and get a new element, y, of S. Symbolically, gx = y (though this looks like we are operating g and x using the group operation of G, this is not what we are doing. x is not even in G; it is in S).

The group of Sn of permutations provides a very natural example of all this. Take for instance S3. Here G = S3 and S = {1,2,3}. Given a particular permutation \sigma \in S_3, we can talk about what the permutation does to any element of S. Take \sigma = 'the permutation that transposes 1 and 2'. Then \sigma2 = 1. So \sigma "acts" on the element 2 and gives the element 1.

Are there any permutations in S_3 which act on 2 and just give 2? Yes, there are two of them:
  1. \sigma_1 = 'the permutation that transposes 1 and 3'
  2. \sigma_2= 'the permuation that leaves all the elements fixed' (identity)

The stablilzer of 2 is the set of both these permutations: Stab(2) = \{\sigma_1, \sigma_2\}. In general, the stablilizer of an element x \in S is:
Stab(x) = \{g \in G | gx = x\}.

goalieplayer said:
...since it just maps every element to 1.
Here is where I think you are somewhat confused. The stablilzer does not map every element to 1. The stablilzer of x \in S consists of all the elements of G that send x to x. The stablilzer does not send anything to 1 because there isn't really a 1 in S. 1 is in the group G.
 
Last edited:
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
562
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K