Finding Points on Curve where Derivative Doesn't Exist

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the derivative of a curve defined by the equation 1/3*y^3 + y*sin(x) = 1 - x^6 and identifying points where this derivative does not exist. The context is calculus, specifically implicit differentiation and the behavior of derivatives.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss implicit differentiation and the resulting expression for dy/dx. There are attempts to find points where the derivative is undefined by setting the denominator of the derivative to zero. Some participants express difficulty in solving the resulting equations algebraically and question the necessity of showing derivation steps.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing with participants sharing their attempts and results. There is no explicit consensus on the exact points where the derivative does not exist, and multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of implicit differentiation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note constraints related to the algebraic complexity of the equations derived from the original curve and the requirement to provide answers without analytic solutions. There is also mention of specific values for the tangent slope at a given point, although these are not universally agreed upon.

AXidenT
Messages
26
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Find dy/dx on the curve

1/3*y^3 + y*sin(x) = 1 - x^6

At which points on the curve does this derivative does not exist? Find the slope of the line tangent to the curve at the point (0,3^(1/3)).

Homework Equations



dy/dx = - Fx/Fy

The Attempt at a Solution



I solved dy/dx implicitly using the above formula to get:

dy/dx = - (y*cos(x) + 6x^5) / (y^2 + sin(x))

To find the points where dy/dx doesn't exist, I let:

y^2 + sin(x) = 0

I've then tried rearranging the above expression in terms of y and x and substituing into the original curve equation, but can't complete the algebra by hand. Wolfram returned multiple answers depending how it's done. Any help?

Thank you! :)

EDIT: And for the last bit, I would just substitute those values for x and y into dy/dx which gives me something about -0.6 from memory?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If sin(x)=-y^2,
1/3*y^3 - y^3 = 1 - x^6
-2/3 y^3 = 1-x^6
y=...
This can be put in y^2 + sin(x) = 0 again to get a (messy) function of x only.
In the same way, you can solve for x and get a function of y only.
I don't think you are supposed to give analytic solutions to those equations.
EDIT: And for the last bit, I would just substitute those values for x and y into dy/dx which gives me something about -0.6 from memory?
The values where the derivative does not exist? That should not give a number for the derivative.
 
So I can't get the values seen here:

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1/3*y^3+y*sin(x)=1-x^6,+y^2+sinx=0

by hand? The algebra seems to reach a dead end every way I try it. How would I state my answer for the points of the curve that dy/dx is undefined then?

And the values for the part of the question asking: "Find the slope of the line tangent to the curve at the point (0,3^(1/3))."

I got-0.69, which looks right on the graph at that point?

Thank you! :)

EDIT: Also for showing the implicit derivative I should just be able to use dy/dx = -Fx/Fy, without showing how to arrive at that formula? Like I shouldn't have to do it with the chain rule?
 
Last edited:
AXidenT said:
How would I state my answer for the points of the curve that dy/dx is undefined then?
I would describe them as "the two solution of this set of equations".

And the values for the part of the question asking: "Find the slope of the line tangent to the curve at the point (0,3^(1/3))."

I got-0.69, which looks right on the graph at that point?
That is not a point, but if you mean x=0,3^(1/3), then it looks reasonable.

EDIT: Also for showing the implicit derivative I should just be able to use dy/dx = -Fx/Fy, without showing how to arrive at that formula? Like I shouldn't have to do it with the chain rule?
Should be fine.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K