Finding Position and Velocity Using Rectilinear Kinematics Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter rmunoz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a kinematics problem involving the acceleration of a particle described by a function of time. Participants are attempting to find the velocity and position of the particle at a specific time using integration techniques. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and homework-related problem-solving.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states the acceleration function as a=(2t -1) m/s² and provides initial conditions for position and velocity.
  • Another participant initially agrees with the calculated velocity of 32 m/s but later retracts their correction, indicating the answer is acceptable.
  • There is confusion regarding the integration process, with one participant questioning the legality of integrating a constant value for velocity.
  • Participants discuss the necessity of integrating twice to find position from acceleration, emphasizing that this is a standard procedure in kinematics.
  • One participant clarifies that the integration should be performed on the function of velocity, not a constant value, to find the position function.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the integration process and the interpretation of the results. There is no consensus on the best approach to take for part b of the problem, and confusion remains regarding the treatment of velocity as a variable versus a constant.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the distinction between integrating a function and evaluating a constant, which may lead to misunderstandings in the application of kinematic equations. The discussion reflects varying levels of familiarity with integration techniques and their application in kinematics.

rmunoz
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The acceleration of a particle is described by the following:
a=(2t -1) m/s^2
So= 1m
Vo= 2m/s

Find
a) velocity of the particle at 6 seconds

b) its position (Sf) at six seconds


Homework Equations



v=ds/dt
a=dv/dt
a*ds=v*dv


The Attempt at a Solution


Using integration I found velocity to be 32 m/s, (dv=apartdt)

Now I'm stuck on part b and since i have yet to learn how to take a double integral to directly relate the acceleration of the particle to its position, I assume it must have something to do with avg velocity or avg acceleration... nonetheless I am stuck on part b and have been for quite some time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rmunoz said:

The Attempt at a Solution


Using integration I found velocity to be 32 m/s, (dv=apartdt)

Your answer is not correct, and the part you have in parentheses seems to be meaningless. Can you show your integration steps?

Edit: Actually your answer is fine. Nevermind.
rmunoz said:
Now I'm stuck on part b and since i have yet to learn how to take a double integral to directly relate the acceleration of the particle to its position,
.
Not really. This is only a "double integral" in the sense that you have to integrate twice in succession. (In mathematics, a double integral actually means something else entirely that is not relevant here). To see why you have to integrate twice, consider the following argument. If:

[tex]v(t) = \frac{ds(t)}{dt}[/tex]

then

[tex]a(t) = \frac{dv(t)}{dt} = \frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{ds(t)}{dt} \right) = \frac{d^2s(t)}{dt^2}[/tex]So acceleration is the second derivative of position (w.r.t. time). In order to calculate the acceleration as function of time, you must differentiate the position function twice. It follows that, since integration is the inverse operation of differentiation, then to go back to position from acceleration, you would have to integrate twice. A more explicit way of showing this would be:

[tex]\frac{dv(t)}{dt} = a(t) \Rightarrow v(t) = \int a(t) \, dt[/tex]

[tex]\frac{ds(t)}{dt} = v(t) \Rightarrow s(t) = \int v(t) \, dt = \int \left(\int a(t) \, dt \right) \, dt[/tex]

rmunoz said:
I assume it must have something to do with avg velocity or avg acceleration... nonetheless I am stuck on part b and have been for quite some time.

Why would you think that?
 
Last edited:
i understand that the dv= a(t)dt can be integrated to acquire
v(t)= [tex]\int[/tex]a(t) dt

However this produces 32 m/s if taken definitely (with 6 and 0 upper and lower limits respectively)... to integrate this again seems unusual since it is a constant (it almost seems to disregard the fact that v is variable with respect to time). This i guess is where i became confused. Is it legal to take the integral of 32m/s as the velocity with respect to time ?
 
rmunoz said:
to integrate this again seems unusual since it is a constant (it almost seems to disregard the fact that v is variable with respect to time).

No no...you integrate the function v(t) to get s(t). That's the definition. You don't integrate v(6 s)! You integrate v(t) to get s(t) and then find the position you want by evaluating the resulting position function there (i.e. you calculate s(6 s)). This is no different from what you did to find the velocity at that time in part a!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K