Finding q(t) (charge) given i(t) (current).

  • Thread starter Thread starter Flinchy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Current
Click For Summary
To find q(t) from i(t), the integral must account for initial charge conditions, specifically q(0) = -6 nC. The correct approach involves integrating i(t) from negative infinity to the desired time, ensuring that the total charge includes contributions from all previous intervals. This method confirms that the charge does not start from zero, but rather from the known initial charge. The instructor's approach is validated, emphasizing the importance of including initial conditions in the integral for accurate charge calculations. Understanding this concept is crucial for correctly applying the relationship between current and charge over time.
Flinchy
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find q(t) for the following function.
http://imgur.com/gTtYRd0We are also given that q(0) = -6 nC.

Homework Equations



<br /> q(t) = \int \mathrm{i(t)}\, \mathrm{d}t

The Attempt at a Solution



This is more of a question about why the steps to the solution are correct, as opposed to how to get to the solution, so I apologize if I posted this in the wrong section.

I would have thought that to find q(t) from x = 0 to x = 5 you would just find i(t) on that interval and integrate it. My teacher, however, showed us the following as the solution.

<br /> q(t) = \int_{-\infty}^0 \mathrm{i(t)}\, \mathrm{d}t + \int_0^t \mathrm{i(t)}\, \mathrm{d}t<br /> \\<br /> \int_{-\infty}^0 \mathrm{i(t)}\, \mathrm{d}t = q(0)<br /> \\<br /> q(t) = q(0) + \int_0^t \mathrm{i(t)}\, \mathrm{d}t<br />

I do not understand why he is including the integral with the lower limit of negative infinity. He does the same for the interval x = 5 to x = 14.

<br /> q(t) = \int_{-\infty}^{5e-6} \mathrm{i(t)}\, \mathrm{d}t + \int_{5e-6}^t \mathrm{i(t)}\, \mathrm{d}t<br /> \\<br /> \int_{-\infty}^{5e-6} \mathrm{i(t)}\, \mathrm{d}t = q(5e-6)<br /> \\<br /> q(t) = q(5e-6) + \int_{5e-6}^t \mathrm{i(t)}\, \mathrm{d}t<br />

My guess would be that he is treating i(t) = 0, when t < 0 (although he never explicitly said this), and then doing this.
<br /> \int_{-\infty}^0 \mathrm{i(t)}\, \mathrm{d}t = q(0) - q({-\infty})<br />
And since i(t) is zero at negative infinity, the integral would just equal q(0). I just can't seem to understand why this is necessary, and why I could not just ignore q(0) and q(5e-6) while integrating. Any help would be much appreciated.EDIT: I think I figured out what I was doing wrong! Since q(t) gives you the total charge at a given time, you need to add the total charge from to the previous interval to the equation of the next, otherwise it is assuming the charge starts from zero? Maybe I'm just grasping at straws...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That approach with an integral starting at -∞ looks more complicated than necessary.

The basic issue is this formula:
Flinchy said:
<br /> q(t) = \int \mathrm{i(t)}\, \mathrm{d}t
The integral is indefinite, so you can always add a constant to it. To determine a charge, you need to know this constant.

If you know the charge at some point in time, you can start your integral there, and add the charge at that point. t=0 would be an obvious choice, but t=-∞ with q-∞ is possible as well (together with the assumption that q0 flow towards the object between -∞ and 0).

t=5*10-6 is a good choice to determine q(t) for t after that point.
 
If q(0-) = 6e-6 C then the total charge at the end of t sec. is just 6e-6 C + the area under the curve from t=0 to t.

There is no need to invoke a weird number like 5e-6 s or any other number.

What your instructor wrote is exactly correct.

Given q(0) = 6e-6 C you don't care what happened for t < 0.
 
Flinchy said:
1. EDIT: I think I figured out what I was doing wrong! Since q(t) gives you the total charge at a given time, you need to add the total charge from to the previous interval to the equation of the next, otherwise it is assuming the charge starts from zero? Maybe I'm just grasping at straws...


That is correct. The "charge from the previous interval" is 6e-6 C.

Total q(t) = 6e-6 C + ∫0t i(t')dt'
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K