Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around seeking advice for securing undergraduate research opportunities, particularly through Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REUs) for the summer of 2012. Participants share their experiences, strategies, and resources for finding and applying to research programs in fields related to petroleum engineering and geosciences.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Debate/contested
- Homework-related
Main Points Raised
- One participant expresses difficulty in securing a research position despite efforts to communicate with professors and seeks advice on finding REU programs.
- Another participant suggests using the NSF REU directory as a resource for finding programs.
- There is a mention that application deadlines typically begin at the end of December or early Spring semester, indicating a timeline for potential applicants.
- A participant shares their positive experience with Columbia's LDEO program, noting that they had a lot of research experience despite not having a high GPA.
- Some participants discuss the competitiveness of REUs, with one stating that many applicants apply to numerous programs but may only gain acceptance to a few.
- Another participant shares their experience of starting research early in their academic career at a small liberal arts school, emphasizing the importance of initiative and strong application materials.
- Concerns are raised about the GPA and extracurricular requirements for REUs, with varying opinions on how much these factors influence acceptance.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants generally agree that securing undergraduate research positions is competitive and that proactive efforts, such as reaching out to potential advisors, are important. However, there is no consensus on the specific GPA or extracurricular requirements needed for REUs, as experiences and opinions vary.
Contextual Notes
Limitations include the variability in research opportunities based on institutional resources and the subjective nature of application evaluations. The discussion reflects personal experiences and does not establish a definitive standard for securing research positions.