Finding temperature coefficient of resistivity of the alloy

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the temperature coefficient of resistivity for an unknown alloy based on current measurements at two different temperatures. The original poster presents initial and final temperatures along with corresponding current values, seeking guidance on how to approach the problem without knowing the resistance.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between current, voltage, and resistance using Ohm's law, questioning how to manipulate the equations without knowing resistance. Some suggest using ratios of currents and resistances to derive the temperature coefficient of resistivity.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering different perspectives on the relationships between current, resistance, and temperature. There are indications of productive dialogue, particularly regarding the implications of constant voltage and changing current on resistance. Some participants are questioning the original poster's understanding of the equations and units involved.

Contextual Notes

There are discussions about the assumptions regarding resistance being constant and the implications of temperature changes on resistance. The original poster expresses confusion about unit consistency in their calculations, which is a point of contention among participants.

Searay330
Messages
20
Reaction score
1
Suppose a wire made from an unknown alloy and having a temperature of 20.0°C carries a current of 0.529 A. At 52.4°C the current is 0.378 A for the same potential difference. Find the temperature coefficient of resistivity of the alloy.

tempinital = 20C
tempfinal = 52.4C
currentInital = .529A
currentFinal = .378A
Voltage = constant but unknownhow do you go about this problem i have tried manipulating ohms law ( I= V/R ) to remove voltage but that always leaves me with IR= IR.

TCOR = temperature coefficient of resistivity;

because the resistance isn't a constant i can't factor it out of RF = RI (1 - TCOR(TF - TI))

i can't use either form because i don't have resistance to solve for resistivity.

if someone could point me in the right direction that would be great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Searay330 said:
leaves me with IR= IR
Since the two measurement voltages were the same, you can write that equation, but you should distinguish between them...

I_1 R_1 = I_2 R_2

So you can find the ratio of the two resistances. Then use the ratio of the two temperatures (be sure to use absolute temperature, not degrees Celsius) to help you find the coefficient of resistivity...
 
Last edited:
Searay330 said:
Suppose a wire made from an unknown alloy and having a temperature of 20.0°C carries a current of 0.529 A. At 52.4°C the current is 0.378 A for the same potential difference. Find the temperature coefficient of resistivity of the alloy.

tempinital = 20C
tempfinal = 52.4C
currentInital = .529A
currentFinal = .378A
Voltage = constant but unknownhow do you go about this problem i have tried manipulating ohms law ( I= V/R ) to remove voltage but that always leaves me with IR= IR.

TCOR = temperature coefficient of resistivity;

because the resistance isn't a constant i can't factor it out of RF = RI (1 - TCOR(TF - TI))

i can't use either form because i don't have resistance to solve for resistivity.
The resistance is constant in each of the tests. I don't see why you can't use the equation. Also, resistivity is proportional to resistance for the same wire. Is it that you don't know how to solve the equation for TCOR?

Also, RF = V/IF and RI=V/II
 
how can the resistance be constant if the voltage is constant and the current changes?
 
Searay330 said:
how can the resistance be constant if the voltage is constant and the current changes?
It's constant with location along the wire.

##R_1=V/I_1## and ##R_2=V/I_2##. So,
$$\frac{R_2}{R_1}=\frac{I_1}{I_2}$$
 
Chestermiller said:
It's constant with location along the wire.

##R_1=V/I_1## and ##R_2=V/I_2##. So,
$$\frac{R_2}{R_1}=\frac{I_1}{I_2}$$

right so you can changed the formula to be
I2/I1 = (1 - TCOR(TF - TI))
 
Searay330 said:
right so you can changed the formula to be
I2/I1 = (1 - TCOR(TF - TI))
Excellent!
 
Chestermiller said:
Excellent!
so then plugging everything in you would get

.378/.529 = (1- x(52.4-20))
meaning x = .0088100072
 
Searay330 said:
so then plugging everything in you would get

.378/.529 = (1- x(52.4-20))
meaning x = .0088100072
Always remember to include units in your calculations and answers... :smile:
 
  • #10
berkeman said:
Always remember to include units in your calculations and answers... :smile:
well that's my problem it says my answers units should be C-1 but by using the formula wouldn't the units just be C
 
  • #11
Searay330 said:
well that's my problem it says my answers units should be C-1 but by using the formula wouldn't the units just be C
Searay330 said:
so then plugging everything in you would get

.378/.529 = (1- x(52.4-20))
meaning x = .0088100072
Include units in your calculation above at each step for each quantity. What do you get now?
 
  • #12
berkeman said:
Include units in your calculation above at each step for each quantity. What do you get now?

.7145557656 (A/A cancels) = (1 - (32.4xC))
- (32.4xC) = .2854442344
- xC = .2854442344/32.4
x = .0088100072 C
 
  • #13
No. Keep the units with the quantity that has them. You don't know x's units until you have solved the equations...

0.378[A]/0.529[A] = (1- x(52.4[C]-20[C]))

Now can you keep going with that?
 
  • #14
berkeman said:
No. Keep the units with the quantity that has them. You don't know x's units until you have solved the equations...

0.378[A]/0.529[A] = (1- x(52.4[C]-20[C]))

Now can you keep going with that?
well that would mean the Amps cancel leaving that as just a number and the only unit left is C which x picks up when its distributed across those numbers. correct
 
  • #15
Searay330 said:
well that would mean the Amps cancel leaving that as just a number and the only unit left is C which x picks up when its distributed across those numbers. correct
Nope.

Since the lefthand side (LHS) of the equation is unitless, the RHS has to also be unitless. On the RHS, "1" is unitless, so x(52.4[C]-20[C]) has to be unitless. The temperatures have units of [C], so what units must x have? :smile:
 
  • #16
berkeman said:
Nope.

Since the lefthand side (LHS) of the equation is unitless, the RHS has to also be unitless. On the RHS, "1" is unitless, so x(52.4[C]-20[C]) has to be unitless. The temperatures have units of [C], so what units must x have? :smile:
oh it must have 1/C
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
  • #17
It Makes perfect sense to me but the homework program told me i got the wrong answer. is there some mistake in my calculation?
 
  • #18
Searay330 said:
It Makes perfect sense to me but the homework program told me i got the wrong answer. is there some mistake in my calculation?

Searay330 said:
RF = RI (1 - TCOR(TF - TI))
Looking back at this equation, resistance goes up with temperature. If the final temperature is higher than the initial temperature, should you be subtracting or adding the delta resistance? I don't know if that's the error, but it jumps out at me...
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
13K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
17K
Replies
1
Views
13K