Finding the angular frequency of an object

Click For Summary
To find the angular frequency (ω) of an object in simple harmonic motion with a period of 0.50s, the formula ω = 2π/T is used, resulting in ω = 12.57 rad/s. However, there were issues with submitting this answer, as it was marked incorrect. The correct submission format for the answer is 13 s^-1, which aligns with the expected dimensional representation. The discussion highlights that while radians are a unit, they are often treated as dimensionless in physics. Ultimately, the correct answer was confirmed as 13 s^-1.
t.kirschner99
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An object undergoes simple harmonic motion along an x-axis with a period of 0.50s and amplitude of 29mm. Its position is x = 12mm when t = 0s. Determine the value of ω in the equation of motion. Suppose that ω > 0.

Homework Equations



$$ω = \frac {2π} {T}$$

The Attempt at a Solution



Earlier in the problem, I found that x(t) = Asin(ωt + ∅i) (which is confirmed correct). The question is asking for the angular frequency of an object going simple harmonic motion (no damping), so I am assuming I would need to just plug the period into the formula above. Thus:

$$ω = \frac {2π} {0.5s}.$$
$$= 12.57 \frac {rad} {s}$$

When I submit this answer though, it says it is incorrect. I've tried entering the solution as 4π rad/s (which it said the answer needed to be in decimal format) and 13 rad/s (which it said that the answer does not have the correct dimensions).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
t.kirschner99 said:
When I submit this answer though, it says it is incorrect. I've tried entering the solution as 4π rad/s (which it said the answer needed to be in decimal format) and 13 rad/s (which it said that the answer does not have the correct dimensions).
You don't say specifically, but it sounds like when you submitted 12.57rad/s it did not complain about the dimensions. If so, that suggests it is happy with the 13 as the numeric value.
Although the radian is a unit, most authorities maintain angles do not have dimension. You could try 13s-1.
 
  • Like
Likes t.kirschner99
haruspex said:
You don't say specifically, but it sounds like when you submitted 12.57rad/s it did not complain about the dimensions. If so, that suggests it is happy with the 13 as the numeric value.
Although the radian is a unit, most authorities maintain angles do not have dimension. You could try 13s-1.

Thank you! 13s-1 was the correct answer.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K