Finding the center frequency and bandwidth of a Pass-band filter

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the center frequency and bandwidth of a pass-band filter. Participants explore the calculations and logic behind determining these parameters, including the definitions of bandwidth and center frequency, and the implications of decoupling in filter analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion regarding the calculations for bandwidth and center frequency, specifically questioning the values of 3.4 kHz and 0.49 kHz.
  • Another participant suggests that bandwidth is defined as the range of frequencies where the amplitude response exceeds 0.707 times the peak amplitude, indicating a method for determining the center frequency.
  • Some participants argue against dividing the analysis into lowpass and highpass sections unless they are decoupled, asserting that the overall bandpass transfer function should be derived instead.
  • One participant contends that the two sections are decoupled based on impedance considerations, suggesting that loading effects are negligible.
  • Another participant provides specific calculated values for cutoff frequencies and bandwidth, referencing the phase sensitivity of frequency-dependent networks.
  • A participant mentions using accurate plots generated by mathematical software to determine cutoff frequencies more reliably than hand-drawn sketches.
  • One participant shares a bandpass transfer function and derives relationships for the natural frequency and quality factor, indicating a method for calculating bandwidth.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit disagreement regarding the validity of separating the filter analysis into lowpass and highpass sections, with some asserting that this is only valid under specific conditions. There is no consensus on the best approach to calculate the center frequency and bandwidth, as multiple methods and interpretations are presented.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note limitations in the analysis, such as the dependence on assumptions about decoupling and the accuracy of hand-drawn sketches versus mathematical plots. The discussion reflects various interpretations of the filter's behavior and the calculations involved.

paulmdrdo
Messages
89
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
See attached photo
Relevant Equations
See attached photo
I tried solving this problem and got it correctly until the part A of the question.

My solution is the same as the one given in the solutions manual until the part I put in the red box.
I don't understand what is the logic behind the calculation of the bandwidth and center frequency there.
Where did the 3.4 Khz and 0.49Khz comes from. Please help me understand this process.
Thank you!
1565929476043.png
1565929594312.png

1565929660447.png

1565929689141.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like they have defined the bandwidth to be frequencies where the response amplitude is greater 0.707x the peak amplitude response, which in this case is an amplitude response greater than 0.5. Then the center frequency is midway between the frequencies where the response amplitude is 0.5.
Note, I didn't verify any of the calculations (too lazy, LOL). Also, I would have done it a bit differently then their method.
 
To me, it is not quite clear what your question is.
More than that, who has performed the "calculation" starting with 27 a ??

To me, the whole process looks wrong.

You cannot divide the analysis into two parts: Lowpass and highpass section.
This is allowed only if both sections are decoupled which is not the case...

The best and most correct way is to find the overall bandpass transfer function as a result of a very simple calculation. From this transfer function you immediately can derive the midfrequency as well as the gain and the bandwidth.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveE
LvW said:
You cannot divide the analysis into two parts: Lowpass and highpass section.
This is allowed only if both sections are decoupled which is not the case...
I contend that the two sections are decoupled. Note that the output impedance of the first stage is <100Ω, and the input to the second stage is more than 100 times larger. Less than 1% loading generally qualifies as irrelevant.

(After all, how many 1/2% capacitors do you find in the wild?)
 
Last edited:
LvW said:
To me, it is not quite clear what your question is.
More than that, who has performed the "calculation" starting with 27 a ??

To me, the whole process looks wrong.

You cannot divide the analysis into two parts: Lowpass and highpass section.
This is allowed only if both sections are decoupled which is not the case...

The best and most correct way is to find the overall bandpass transfer function as a result of a very simple calculation. From this transfer function you immediately can derive the midfrequency as well as the gain and the bandwidth.
Yes! That's the alternate method I obliquely referred to. With only 4 elements, it's not hard to find the transfer function.

For a relatively low Q filter, you should be able to separate the HPF and LPF response as a reasonable approximation. Certainly if Q < 0.1 or so, when the roots are real and well separated.
Based on these answers, Q ≈ 0.4, so the approximation isn't great.

This is a nice reference for this :
http://eas.uccs.edu/~cwang/ECE5955_F2015/PowerElectronics_f2015/ch8/Sect8-1-7.pdf
Plus the adjacent sections.
 
Tom.G said:
I contend that the two sections are decoupled. Note that the output impedance of the first stage is <100Ω, and the input to the second stage is more than 100 times larger. Less than 1% loading generally qualifies as irrelevant.
(After all, how many 1/2% capacitors do you find in the wild?)

Tom.G - here are the correct results. Do you still think that "loading qualifies as irrelevant" ?

fc1=483.33 Hz (3dB-corner)
fc2=3276.3 Hz (3db corner)
Bandwidth B=2793 Hz
Fo=1258 Hz.

Explanation for loading effects: The phase of frequency-dependent networks is much more sensible to simplifications and tolerances than the magnitudes.
 
paulmdrdo said:
I tried solving this problem and got it correctly until the part A of the question.

My solution is the same as the one given in the solutions manual until the part I put in the red box.
I don't understand what is the logic behind the calculation of the bandwidth and center frequency there.
Where did the 3.4 Khz and 0.49Khz comes from. Please help me understand this process.
Thank you!

I think the 3.4 kHz and 0.49 kHz were determined by looking at a crude hand made sketch of the frequency response.

Here are accurate plots of the responses of the two possibilities. The response of the coupled transfer function is shown in blue, and the uncoupled TF is shown in red. The first plot goes from 10 Hz to 10 kHz, as the problem required, rather than from 100 Hz to 10 kHz.

From these plots a better determination of the two cutoff frequencies (where the response is .5) can be made because I've made the plots with a mathematical software rather than just sketching a few points by hand and connecting the dots. I've shown grid lines at the frequencies calculated by LvW.

Two BP.png
 
paulmdrdo said:
I don't understand what is the logic behind the calculation of the bandwidth and center frequency there.
Where did the 3.4 Khz and 0.49Khz comes from. Please help me understand this process.

Here is the bandpass transfer function:

H(s)=sT1/[1+s(T1+T2+R1C2)+s²T1T2] with T1=R1C1 and T2=R2C2

If we compare this function with the general second-order function we can derive:

wo=1/sqrt(T1T2) and
Q=1/[wo(T1+T2+R1C2)] and
B=wo/Q


Inserting the given values we get the figures as given in my former post.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K