Finding the Circumference of a Circle Using Improper Integrals

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MacLaddy1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle Circumference
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on using improper integrals to find the circumference of a circle with radius \(a\). The key formula derived is \(C = 2\pi a\), achieved through the arc length formula and the evaluation of an improper integral. The Cartesian equation of the circle is \(x^2 + y^2 = a^2\), and the arc length is calculated using the limits of integration from \(0\) to \(a\). The final result incorporates symmetry, multiplying the integral result by 4 to account for all quadrants.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of improper integrals and their definitions
  • Familiarity with the arc length formula in calculus
  • Knowledge of Cartesian equations of circles
  • Basic differentiation techniques for functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and applications of improper integrals in calculus
  • Learn more about the arc length formula and its derivation
  • Explore the concept of symmetry in geometric figures
  • Investigate the relationship between integrals and geometric measurements
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians interested in geometric applications of integrals, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of improper integrals and arc length calculations.

MacLaddy1
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Hello again,

I'm finding myself stuck on what is probably a simple question, but I believe I am taking the wrong approach.
The section is "Volumes with infinite integrals," and the chapter is "Improper Integrals."
The question, "Use calculus to find the circumference of a circle with radius a."
I've looked at this from the approach of integrating the circle equation in the arc length formula, but I don't think it's looking for a proof like that. Somehow this question should have an integral with infinity in it's limit.

A shove in the right direction would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks again, everyone.

Mac
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MacLaddy said:
Hello again,

I'm finding myself stuck on what is probably a simple question, but I believe I am taking the wrong approach.
The section is "Volumes with infinite integrals," and the chapter is "Improper Integrals."
The question, "Use calculus to find the circumference of a circle with radius a."
I've looked at this from the approach of integrating the circle equation in the arc length formula, but I don't think it's looking for a proof like that. Somehow this question should have an integral with infinity in it's limit.

A shove in the right direction would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks again, everyone.

Mac

Hi MacLaddy, :)

Improper integrals may not contain a "infinity" in their limits. They are defined in terms of the boundedness of the domain of integration and the integrand.

The Cartesian equation of a circle of radius \(a\) with its center at \((0,0)\) is given by,

\[x^2+y^2=a^2\]

\[\Rightarrow y=\pm\sqrt{a^2-x^2}\mbox{ where }-a\leq x\leq a\]

In the first quadrant,

\[\Rightarrow y=\sqrt{a^2-x^2}\mbox{ where }0\leq x\leq a\]

\[\Rightarrow y'=\frac{dy}{dx}=\frac{-x}{\sqrt{a^2-x^2}}\]

The arc length of a curve defined on \((c,d)\) is given by,

\[s = \int_{c}^{d} \sqrt { 1 + [f'(x)]^2 }\, dx\]

In this case, \(c=0\mbox{ and }d=a\). But on the interval \([0,a]\)the integrand becomes unbounded. Therefore, we get the following improper integral if the limit exists.

\[s = \int_{0}^{a} \sqrt { 1 + \left[\frac{-x}{\sqrt{a^2-x^2}}\right]^2 }\, dx:=\lim_{k\rightarrow a}\int_{0}^{k} \sqrt { 1 + \left[\frac{-x}{\sqrt{a^2-x^2}}\right]^2 }\]

\[\Rightarrow L = \lim_{k\rightarrow a}\int_{0}^{k} \sqrt {\frac{a^2}{a^2-x^2}}\, dx\]

\[\Rightarrow L =\left[a\sin^{-1}\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)\right]_{0}^{k\rightarrow a}\]

\[\Rightarrow L =\frac{\pi a}{2}\]

Since the curve is symmetric around the x and y axes we have to multiply this by 4 in order to get the circumference\((C)\) of the curve.

\[\therefore C=2\pi a\]

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.
 
Wow... Thanks Sudharaka, that's quite the reply. I appreciate that.

It looks like I was "somewhat" on the right track before, but I am definitely misunderstanding some of the inner workings in this process. I'll stare at this for a few days and make sure it sinks in fully.

Thanks again,
Mac
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
15K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K