Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Finding the distance in an acceleration problem?

  1. Mar 10, 2010 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    What distance is required to stop a car going 90km/h if the car can stop with an acceleration of -6.0m/s2?

    2. Relevant equations
    a = v2-v1/t
    d = (v1+v2/2)t

    3. The attempt at a solution
    I'm thinking first we have to solve for t. Which would be the speed divided by acceleration, which is -0.36 km/h^2 over 80km/h which is 0.0045 hours.

    Now to solve for distance, it would be 80km/2 x 0.0045

    Which leaves me with 0.18 which is completely wrong because the answer is supposed to be 41 m.

    Help please? Thank you.
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 10, 2010 #2
    Oops speed over acceleration is actually 80km/h over -0.36km/h, but that still gives me the wrong answer..
  4. Mar 10, 2010 #3
    Check your equation for D again.
  5. Mar 10, 2010 #4
    It's right ?

    D = (V1 + v2/2) x T
  6. Mar 10, 2010 #5
    1. Is it 90 or 80 km/h?
    2. your formula should be [tex]\Delta d=\frac{v_{1}+v_{2}}{2}\Delta t[/tex]
  7. Mar 10, 2010 #6
    It says 80km on my sheet.
    But yeah, that is the formula I am using.
    (I do v1+v2 first, and then divide it by 2)
  8. Mar 10, 2010 #7
    I think I see your mistake. How did you convert [tex]m/s^{2}[/tex] to [tex]km/h^{2}[/tex]
  9. Mar 10, 2010 #8
    Oh sorry for writing 90 in the first post, that was a typo. Should be 80km.

    Okay so it's 80km/h.
    I converted that -5.0m/s into km/^s by doing this:

    = - 0.005

    Then I multiplied this by 60..

    But now I'm getting -0.3. x_x
    Ahh, can anyone thoroughly help me? This is so frustrating! I am so lost. =(
  10. Mar 10, 2010 #9
    Ok, I think the only mistake you made was this conversion. It's acceleration, therefore has a unit of either [tex]m/s^{2}[/tex] or [tex]km/h^{2}[/tex], notice the square in the bottom. I tried converting it and got [tex]1m/s^{2}=12960km/h^{2}[/tex]
  11. Mar 10, 2010 #10
    How did you get that?
  12. Mar 10, 2010 #11
    Now I just confused 2 questions together. Forget this whole thing, it's a flop. =(
    I'll ask my teacher.
  13. Mar 10, 2010 #12
    Ok, this is what I did.
    Try and see what you get.
  14. Mar 10, 2010 #13
    Oh, so I have to square the seconds in the speed part?
  15. Mar 10, 2010 #14
    of course!
  16. Mar 10, 2010 #15
    Now I got -0.1296..
    Kinda on the right track.

    I did -0.006/(0.36^2)
  17. Mar 10, 2010 #16
    nope, still wrong. 1/3600 is not equal to 0.36.
  18. Mar 10, 2010 #17
    Is this considered partially right?
    0.006km/3600 seconds?
  19. Mar 10, 2010 #18
    You really need to work on unit conversion. Let me show you:
    [tex]1km/h^{2}=1000m/(3600s)^{2}[/tex] 1km is replaced by 1000m, and 1h is replace by 3600s.
    [tex]1km/h^{2}=1000m/(3600^{2}s^{2})[/tex] notice that both the 3600 and s are squared.

    [tex]1km/h^{2}=\frac{1000}{3600^{2}}\frac{m}{s^{2}}[/tex] separate the unit from the numbers.



    Last edited: Mar 10, 2010
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook