Finding the E-field between two infinite plane charged sheets

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the electric field between two infinite, non-conducting sheets with uniform surface charge densities. The sheets have charge densities of p1 = 13.35 µC/m² and p2 = -8.65 µC/m², and they are positioned parallel to each other with a separation distance of 0.245 m.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the uniformity of the electric field between the sheets and the impact of the distance on the calculation. There are questions about the direction of the electric fields due to each sheet and how they combine. Some participants express confusion about significant figures and their effect on the final answer.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring the directions of the electric fields and their contributions. There is acknowledgment of potential issues with significant figures, and some participants have indicated that adjusting these figures resolved their concerns.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of the signs of the charge densities and how they affect the resultant electric field. There is also mention of marking software's sensitivity to significant figures, which may influence the final presentation of answers.

aximwolf
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two infinite-plane non-conducting, thin sheets of uniform surface charge p1 = 13.35 uC/m2 and p2 = -8.65 uC/m2) are parallel to each other and d = 0.245 m apart. (As shown in the diagram below.) What is the electric field between the sheets? (Note: the field is positive if it is parallel to the vector x).

prob18a.gif


Homework Equations



Sigma/2*epsilon_not

Epsilon not = 8.85e-12 (SI Units)

The Attempt at a Solution



The distance between the sheets should not matter in calculating the E-field between them because the E-field between them is uniform. We are given two sigmas and since the net charge on the field is toward the negative plane we just sum the two over 2*epsilon_not, and Epsilon not is a constant.

sigma1=13.35e-6 C/m^2
sigma2=-8.65e-6 C/m^2

(sigma1 + sigma2)/(2*epsilon_not) = E-field
(13.35e-6 + 8.65e-6)/(2*epsilon_not) = 1.2e6 N/C
Than since the E-field is perpendicular to the planes, but pointing in the opposite direction of positive X the answer becomes negative.
Answer: -1.2e6 N/C (unfortunately I tried this and did not get the problem right)

What did I get wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the region between the sheets:
What is the direction of the E field due to the σ1 sheet?

What is the direction of the E field due to the σ2 sheet?​
 
The E-field on sigma1 is going -x and so is sigma2 right?
 
Is the marking software fussy about significant figures?
 
aximwolf said:
The E-field [STRIKE]on[/STRIKE] due to sigma1 is going -x and so is sigma2 right?

Right, so you should have a negative plus a negative.
 
Right but that doesn't change the answer numerically am I forgetting a step?
 
aximwolf said:
Right but that doesn't change the answer numerically am I forgetting a step?
Why did you express your answer to only 2 sig figs? (To repeat what gneill already pointed out.)
 
More sig figs worked thank you everyone!
 
aximwolf said:
Right but that doesn't change the answer numerically am I forgetting a step?
You have:
E-field due to sigma1=13.35e-6 C/m2
E-field due to sigma2=-8.65e-6 C/m2


But, if they're both pointing left (as vectors), then they should both be negative !

E1 + E2 = -13.35×10-6 + -8.65×10-6 = ____ ?
 
  • #10
yes that's the way I ended up doing it -13.35e-6+-8.65e-6
 
  • #11
That's stange, I don't see that result anywhere in this thread.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
483