Finding the eigenvalues of a 3x3

  • Thread starter Thread starter stryker105
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    3x3 Eigenvalues
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the eigenvalues of a 3x3 matrix. The original poster presents a matrix and applies the determinant equation for eigenvalues, but encounters discrepancies in the results compared to expected outcomes.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants analyze the determinant calculation and question the signs and terms used in the characteristic polynomial. There is a focus on the correct application of the cofactor expansion formula and its implications on the eigenvalue computation.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in clarifying the mathematical steps involved in the eigenvalue calculation. Some have pointed out potential errors in the original poster's formulation, while others suggest alternative interpretations of the determinant expansion.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted discrepancy between the original poster's calculated eigenvalues and those expected by the software being used. Participants are examining the implications of the signs and terms in the determinant expression.

stryker105
Messages
4
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Find the eigenvalues of:
|13 -30 0|
|1 0 0|
|0 1 0|

Homework Equations



Equation for the eigenvalues: det(A-λI)=0

Cofactor expansion = det A = a11(a22a33-a23a32)+a12(a23a31-a21a33)+a13(a21a32-a22a31)

The Attempt at a Solution



|13-λ -30 0 |
| 1 -λ 0 |
| 0 1 -λ|

(13 -λ)(λ^{2})-30(-λ)+0 = 0
13λ^{2}-λ^{3}+30
-λ^{3}+13λ^{2}+ 30λ
-λ(λ^{2}-13λ-30)
(λ+2)(λ-15)

Eigenvalues = 0, 2, 15

However, this not the correct answer according the the software I'm using. Can anyone see what I'm doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The -λ in bold should be just λ

stryker105 said:
(13 -λ)(λ^{2})-30()+0 = 0
 
Hmm, I'd say that the -30(-λ) should really be --30(-λ).
 
I like Serena said:
Hmm, I'd say that the -30(-λ) should really be --30(-λ).

Yes, I agree that that is the most common way of seeing it. But I guess that the OP wanted to follow his formula:

Cofactor expansion = det A = a11(a22a33-a23a32)+a12(a23a31-a21a33)+a13(a21a32-a22a31)

In that case, it is -30\lambda. But it is a weird way of doing things, agreed.
 
Expanding on the last column gives -\lambda(\lambda^2- 13\lambda+ 30), as I Like Serena and micromass are saying, not -\lambda(\lambda^2- 13\lambda- 30).

That factors as -\lambda(\lambda- 10)(\lambda- 3)= 0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K