Finding the Electric Field as a Result of Two Point Charges

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field at point (0,0,8) due to two point charges: a −3 µC charge located at (0,0,4) and a +3 µC charge at (0,0,-4). The electric field is computed using the formula E = k_e * q / r². The user initially calculates the electric field contributions from both charges but arrives at an incorrect total of -1498.33334 N/C instead of the expected 609 N/C. The user also attempts a calculation for point (4,4,0) but again receives an unexpected result of 487 N/C.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's Law and electric fields
  • Familiarity with vector addition in three-dimensional space
  • Knowledge of the constants involved, specifically k_e (Coulomb's constant)
  • Basic proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of superposition in electric fields
  • Study the derivation and application of Coulomb's Law
  • Learn about vector calculus in three dimensions
  • Practice using LaTeX for formatting equations correctly
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone involved in solving problems related to electric fields and point charges.

Jefferson
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


There is a −3 µC point charge at (0,0,4) and a +3 µC point charge at (0,0,-4). What is the magnitude and direction of the electric field at point (0,0,8)? What is the magnitude and direction of the electric field at point (0,0,8)? [/B]

Homework Equations


[itex][/itex][itex]E = \frac{ k_e q }{ r^2 }<b>[<b>/itex]</b></b>[/B]<br /> <br /> <h2>The Attempt at a Solution</h2> <br /> It should be as simple as just adding the electric field caused by each point charge.<br /> <b>[itex][/itex]</b>[itex](0,0,8)[<b>/itex]</b>:<br /> <b>[itex][/itex]</b>[itex](0,0,8) - (0,0,4) = (0,0,4)[/itex]<b><br /> [itex][/itex]</b>[itex](0,0,8) - (0,0,-4) = (0,0,12)[/itex]<b><br /> <b>[itex][/itex]</b>[itex]\frac{ k_e[/itex]</b>[itex]<b>−3 \mu C (0,0,4) }{ 4^3} + <b>\frac{ <b>k_e</b> <b>3 \mu C (0,0,12) }{ 12^3 }</b></b></b>[/itex]<b><b><b><br /> <br /> -1685.625 + 187.29166 = -1498.33334<br /> However, the answer I should be getting (apparently) is 609<br /> <br /> (4,4,0):<br /> <b><b>(4,4,0) </b>- (0,0,4) = (4,4,-4)<br /> <b>(4,4,0)</b> - (0,0,-4) = (4,4,4)<br /> <br /> <b>k<sub>e</sub> <b>−3 µC (4,4,-4) / (4^2 + 4^2 + 4^2)^(3/2) + <b>k<sub>e</sub> <b>3 µC <b>(4,4,4) / (4^2 + 4^2 + 4^2)^(3/2)<br /> <br /> <b>k<sub>e</sub> <b>−3 µC (4,4,-4) / (48)^(3/2) + <b>k<sub>e</sub> <b>3 µC <b>(4,4,4) / (48)^(3/2)<br /> <br /> (-324.4, -<b>324.4, <b>324.4) + (<b>324.4,<b>324.4,<b>324.4) = (0,0, 648.8)<br /> However, the answer I should be getting is 487<br /> <br /> Am I doing something wrong?<br /> (and why is it ignoring my LaTex tags?)</b></b></b></b></b></b></b></b></b></b></b></b></b></b></b></b><br /> </b></b></b>[/B][/itex][/itex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Oops, sorry, didn't mean to double post.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K