Finding the electron drift speed

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the average drift speed of conduction electrons in n-type germanium under a specified current. The user initially calculated a drift speed of 318 m/s using incorrect dimensions for a circular cross-section, leading to confusion with the provided answer of 31 m/s. The correct approach involves treating the germanium as a rectangular prism, using the dimensions of 2.0 mm width and 0.25 mm thickness to derive the correct drift speed. The final drift speed is confirmed to be 31 m/s.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of current density and drift speed equations
  • Familiarity with the properties of n-type germanium
  • Knowledge of unit conversion to SI base units
  • Basic principles of solid-state physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of the drift speed formula I=nAve
  • Study the electrical properties of n-type semiconductors
  • Learn about the significance of cross-sectional area in current calculations
  • Explore unit conversion techniques for physics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying solid-state physics, electrical engineering students, and anyone interested in semiconductor physics and current flow in materials.

MBBphys
Gold Member
Messages
55
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A piece of n-type germanium is 2.0mm wide and 0.25 mm thick. At a certain temperature, the number of conduction electrons per cubic metre is 6 x 1020 m-3. What is the average drift speed of the electrons when a current of 1.5 mA flows? (e=1.6 x 10-19

Homework Equations


I=nAve

The Attempt at a Solution


So I converted all the units to SI base.

1.5/1000 = 6 x 1020 x (0.125/1000)2 x pi x 1.6 x 10-19 x v

v = 318.309...

v=318 metres per second (3sf)
.

But the answer booklet gives 31 metres per second. Am I wrong or is it wrong?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are wrong. I got 31m. Where did 0.125 and pi come from? I don't see any circles in the problem statement. It has a thickness and a width --- that sounds like a rectangular prism.
 
Ah, right, so I have to do [(2/1000)*(0.25/1000)] rather than use pi, because it is a cuboid and not a circular piece of wire? I think because I usually do questions based on copper wires that are circular, I assumed the same here, but clearly that is wrong!

Thank you
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K