MHB Finding the equation of the parabola

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chipset3600
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parabola
Chipset3600
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
Hello guys, please help me, knowing that the parabola passes through the points A(0,1), B(-1,-2) e C(-2,7). How can i find the equation?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This question has also been posted on MHF for which responses have been given.

I don't want to see the folks here take the time to post help when it has already been given elsewhere. ;)
 
Hello, Chipset3600!

Find the equation of the parabola passing through: A(0,1), B(-1,-2), C(-2,7).
There are two such parabolas: one "vertical" \cup, the other "horizontal" \supset.Vertical: .y \:=\:ax^2 + bx + c

Substitute the points and create a system of three equations.
The system has the solution: .a = 6,\:b = 9,\:c = 1

The equation is: .y \;=\;6x^2 + 9x + 1Horizontal: .x \;=\;ay^2 + by + c

Substitute the points and create a system of three equations.
The system has the solution: .a = \text{-}\tfrac{2}{27},\:b = \tfrac{7}{27},\:c = \text{-}\tfrac{5}{27}

The equation is: .x \;=\;\text{-}\tfrac{2}{27}y^2 + \tfrac{7}{27}y - \tfrac{5}{27}
 
I didn't consider anything but the parabola with vertical axis of symmetry...I suppose we could find an infinite number of parabolas by rotating the axes by any angle we choose. (Cool)
 
Thanks guys :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top