MHB Finding the final distance for the compressing in a spring system

cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
Dear Every one,

Here is the question to the problem:

As shown in the figure below, a box of mass m = 5.00 kg is sliding across a horizontal frictionless surface with an initial speed vi = 2.40 m/s when it encounters a spring of constant k = 2230 N/m. The box comes momentarily to rest after compressing the spring some amount xc. Determine the final compression xc of the spring.
7-p-028.gif



Is there way to use the Work-Energy Thereom to solve this problem? If so, you help me through step by step directions?
Thanks,
Cbarker1
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
kinetic energy of the mass = potential energy stored in the spring

graph of kinetic energy and elastic potential energy vs position ...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Let's look at this dynamically, where time $t=0$ coincides with the time the box first contacts the spring, and orient our $x$-axis of motion such that the origin coincides with the point where the box first contacts the spring. Using Newton's 2nd law of motion, and Hooke's law we obtain the IVP:

$$mx''(t)=-kx(t)$$ where $$x'(0)=v_i,\,x(0)=0$$

Let's write the ODE in standard linear form:

$$x''(t)+\frac{k}{m}x(t)=0$$

By the theory of 2nd order linear homogeneous ODE's, we know the solution will take the form:

$$x(t)=c_1\cos\left(\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}t\right)+c_2\sin\left(\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}t\right)$$

Hence:

$$x'(t)=-c_1\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}\sin\left(\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}t\right)+c_2\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}\cos\left(\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}t\right)$$

Using the given initial conditions, we obtain the system:

$$0=c_1$$

$$v_i=c_2\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}\implies c_2=\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}v_i$$

And so the solution to the IVP is given by:

$$x(t)=\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}v_i\sin\left(\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}t\right)$$ where $$0\le t\le\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}\pi$$

And we have:

$$x'(t)=v_i\cos\left(\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}t\right)$$

When the spring reaches maximal compression, we must have:

$$x'(t)=0\implies \sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}t=\frac{\pi}{2}\implies t=\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}\cdot\frac{\pi}{2}$$

And so we find:

$$x_c=x\left(\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}\cdot\frac{\pi}{2}\right)=\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}v_i\sin\left(\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}\cdot\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}\cdot\frac{\pi}{2}\right)=\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}v_i$$

Now, if we use energy considerations, we know the initial kinetic energy of the box must equal the work done to compress the spring when the spring reaches maximal compression:

$$\frac{1}{2}mv_i^2=\frac{1}{2}kx_c^2$$

Solving for $x_c$, we find:

$$x_c=\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}v_i\quad\checkmark$$

Notice this formula is not only dimensionally consistent, but it also makes sense when we look at what happens when we change any of the parameters:

  • Increase/decrease the mass of the box, and the compression distance increases/decreases too.
  • Increase/decrease the stiffness of the spring and the compression distance decreases/increases.
  • Increase/decrease the initial velocity of the box, and the compression distance increases/decreases too.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top