MHB Finding the final distance for the compressing in a spring system

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves a 5.00 kg box sliding at 2.40 m/s that compresses a spring with a constant of 2230 N/m. The Work-Energy Theorem can be applied, equating the initial kinetic energy of the box to the potential energy stored in the spring at maximum compression. The derived formula for the final compression distance, xc, is xc = √(m/k) * vi, which shows how changes in mass, spring stiffness, and initial velocity affect the compression distance. The solution also confirms that the approach is dimensionally consistent and logically sound. Thus, the final compression of the spring can be accurately determined using these principles.
cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
Dear Every one,

Here is the question to the problem:

As shown in the figure below, a box of mass m = 5.00 kg is sliding across a horizontal frictionless surface with an initial speed vi = 2.40 m/s when it encounters a spring of constant k = 2230 N/m. The box comes momentarily to rest after compressing the spring some amount xc. Determine the final compression xc of the spring.
7-p-028.gif



Is there way to use the Work-Energy Thereom to solve this problem? If so, you help me through step by step directions?
Thanks,
Cbarker1
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
kinetic energy of the mass = potential energy stored in the spring

graph of kinetic energy and elastic potential energy vs position ...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Let's look at this dynamically, where time $t=0$ coincides with the time the box first contacts the spring, and orient our $x$-axis of motion such that the origin coincides with the point where the box first contacts the spring. Using Newton's 2nd law of motion, and Hooke's law we obtain the IVP:

$$mx''(t)=-kx(t)$$ where $$x'(0)=v_i,\,x(0)=0$$

Let's write the ODE in standard linear form:

$$x''(t)+\frac{k}{m}x(t)=0$$

By the theory of 2nd order linear homogeneous ODE's, we know the solution will take the form:

$$x(t)=c_1\cos\left(\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}t\right)+c_2\sin\left(\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}t\right)$$

Hence:

$$x'(t)=-c_1\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}\sin\left(\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}t\right)+c_2\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}\cos\left(\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}t\right)$$

Using the given initial conditions, we obtain the system:

$$0=c_1$$

$$v_i=c_2\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}\implies c_2=\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}v_i$$

And so the solution to the IVP is given by:

$$x(t)=\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}v_i\sin\left(\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}t\right)$$ where $$0\le t\le\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}\pi$$

And we have:

$$x'(t)=v_i\cos\left(\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}t\right)$$

When the spring reaches maximal compression, we must have:

$$x'(t)=0\implies \sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}t=\frac{\pi}{2}\implies t=\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}\cdot\frac{\pi}{2}$$

And so we find:

$$x_c=x\left(\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}\cdot\frac{\pi}{2}\right)=\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}v_i\sin\left(\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}\cdot\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}\cdot\frac{\pi}{2}\right)=\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}v_i$$

Now, if we use energy considerations, we know the initial kinetic energy of the box must equal the work done to compress the spring when the spring reaches maximal compression:

$$\frac{1}{2}mv_i^2=\frac{1}{2}kx_c^2$$

Solving for $x_c$, we find:

$$x_c=\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}v_i\quad\checkmark$$

Notice this formula is not only dimensionally consistent, but it also makes sense when we look at what happens when we change any of the parameters:

  • Increase/decrease the mass of the box, and the compression distance increases/decreases too.
  • Increase/decrease the stiffness of the spring and the compression distance decreases/increases.
  • Increase/decrease the initial velocity of the box, and the compression distance increases/decreases too.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top