Finding the instantaneous power

  • Thread starter Thread starter theBEAST
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating instantaneous power using phasor forms and time-domain multiplication. The initial approach of multiplying the phasors did not yield the correct results, prompting a reevaluation of the current representation. The key insight is recognizing that √(2)cos(337t + π) is equivalent to -√(2)cos(337t), which simplifies the power calculation. The final expression for power is presented as -2cos²(337t), which can also be expressed in an alternative form involving cos(754t). Understanding these transformations is crucial for solving similar problems in electrical engineering.
theBEAST
Messages
361
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


5WxmuXj.png


Homework Equations


P = IV

The Attempt at a Solution


The solution is there and they did it by multiplying everything in the time domain.

However, I decided to try to multiply the phasor forms to get the power but that did not work...

V*I = sqrt(2)cos(377t) * sqrt(2)cos(377t+pi)
= (sqrt2<0)(sqrt2<180)
= 2<180
= 2cos(377t+pi)

What is wrong with this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We want to simplify I first..
##√(2)cos(337t + \pi) \equiv -√(2)cos(337t) ##
Therefore, ##I = -√(2)cos(337t) ##
## P = IV = (-√(2)cos(337t))(√(2)cos(337t)) = -2cos^2(337t) ##
By the double-angle formulas:
##cos 2u \equiv 2cos^2u - 1##
##-cos 2u - 1 \equiv -2cos^2u##

$$ -2cos^2(337t) \equiv -cos(754t) - 1$$
$$ -cos(754t) - 1 \equiv cos(754t + \pi) -1 $$

The key to this problem is recognizing that $$√(2)cos(337t + \pi) \equiv -√(2)cos(337t)$$
Leaving your answer as ##-2cos^2(337t) ##would be fine since ##-2cos^2(337t) \equiv -1+1cos(754t + \pi). ##
 
Last edited:
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K