Finding the Inverse of a Function

  • Thread starter Thread starter matadorqk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions Natural
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the inverse of a function defined as f(x) = ln(x) + ln(x-2) - ln(x²-4) for x > 2. The original poster seeks to express f(x) in a specific logarithmic form and subsequently find its inverse.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to simplify the function and expresses it in a different logarithmic form. Some participants suggest factoring the denominator and canceling terms. There is discussion about the process of finding the inverse, including swapping variables and manipulating logarithmic expressions.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, providing hints and clarifications. Some guidance has been offered regarding the steps to find the inverse, but there is no explicit consensus on the final approach or solution.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes the relationship between the domain and range of the function and its inverse, indicating an understanding of the properties of inverse functions. There is a mention of potential confusion regarding the notation used in the process of finding the inverse.

matadorqk
Messages
96
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The function f is defined for [tex]x>2[/tex] by [tex]f(x)=\ln x+\ln(x-2)-\ln(x^{2}-4)[/tex]
a. Express f(x) in the form of [tex](\ln\frac{x}{x+a})[/tex]

b. Find an expression for [tex]f^{-1}(x)[/tex]

Homework Equations


..

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I simplified it to:

[tex]f(x)=\ln(\frac{x^{2}-2x}{x^{2}-4})[/tex]

I can't figure what to do, ill keep thinking
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I hope you mean you simplified it to log((x-2)/(x^2-4)). Factor the denominator. What was for dinner?
 
Dick said:
I hope you mean you simplified it to log((x-2)/(x^2-4)). Factor the denominator. What was for dinner?

Im sorry, I left an ln x out, for some reason I typed \lnx and it appeared as nothing. Should I still factor the denominator? ~ I had chow mein with chicken :D
 
I love chicken chow mein. You can still factor the denominator and cancel the x-2 in the numerator.
 
Dick said:
I love chicken chow mein. You can still factor the denominator and cancel the x-2 in the numerator.

Oh I get it!

So [tex]f(x)=\ln \frac {x(x-2)}{(x+2)(x-2)}[/tex]

So [tex]f(x)=\ln \frac{x}{x+2}[/tex]

Awesome, part A solved. Now find the inverse..
Give me a sec here

Argh, the only way i know of obtaining inverses is by flipping x and y's.. here it seems a tidbit different. I know that:

The domain of the inverse is the range of the original function.
The range of the inverse is the domain of the original function.

How am I supposed to find the inverse :S, I get that [tex]f^{-1}(x)=(e^{x})(y+2)..[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Any hints?
 
matadorqk said:
Oh I get it!

So [tex]f(x)=\ln \frac {x(x-2)}{(x+2)(x-2)}[/tex]

So [tex]f(x)=\ln \frac{x}{x+2}[/tex]

Awesome, part A solved. Now find the inverse..
Give me a sec here

Argh, the only way i know of obtaining inverses is by flipping x and y's.. here it seems a tidbit different. I know that:

The domain of the inverse is the range of the original function.
The range of the inverse is the domain of the original function.

How am I supposed to find the inverse :S, I get that [tex]f^{-1}(x)=(e^{x})(y+2)..[/tex]

No, a function of "x" cannot have a "y" in it!
You have to start with [tex]y= ln(\frac{x}{x+2})[/tex]
The first step is, just as you say, to "swap" x and y:
[tex]x= ln(\frac{y}{y+2}[/tex]
Now solve for y. You need to get rid of the log:
[tex]e^x= \frac{y}{y+2}[/tex]
Now get rid of the fraction by multiplying both sides by y+ 2.
[tex]e^x(y+2)= y[/tex]
This is where you stopped, right? But that "y" on the right is NOT the inverse function because you still haven't solved for y.
[tex]e^xy + 2e^x= y[/tex]
Now get y by itself on the left, with no y on the right. Can you do that?
(How would you solve ay+ b= y for y?)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K