Finding the magnification of a ball lens

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the magnification of a ball lens, specifically how to relate effective and back focal lengths for this purpose. Participants reference literature suggesting high magnification values for small diameter lenses but express uncertainty about the underlying calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to compute angular spreads for magnification, referencing the relationship between off-axis points and the focal plane. Some suggest using the lensmaker's formula to derive focal length and magnification, while others emphasize starting from first principles.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various approaches being explored. Some participants have offered guidance on calculating magnification through angular relationships, while others question the applicability of the lensmaker's formula for this specific lens type.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of specific measurements, such as the reference distance of 10 inches for magnification calculations, and the discussion includes considerations about the limitations of the lensmaker's formula for thin lenses.

DharshanT
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
How to find the magnification of a ball lens?
Relevant Equations
Please see image below.
245537


I don't really know how to relate the effective and back focal lengths for magnification purposes. Literature review suggests that a lens of 1mm diameter can have a magnification of 350x-400x, but I don't really know the calculations behind it. Please advise.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe you need to take a point off-axis an distance ## d ## in the focal plane and compute the ## \Delta \theta_{magnified} ## for the parallel rays that emerge. The magnification is often referenced to 10" or about 25 cm, if I'm not mistaken, so that magnification ## M=\frac{ \Delta \theta_{magnified}}{d/(10")} ##. ## \\ ## In more detail: ## \\ ## Without the ball, the eye sees an object of size ## d ## subtending an angular spread of ## \Delta \theta_{unmagnified}=\frac{d}{10"} ##. ## \\ ## When viewed with the ball, the angular spread will be ## \Delta \theta_{magnified} ##= whatever you compute by putting the object as a point in the focal plane off-axis by a distance ## d ##. ## \\ ## The ratio of these two angles, ## M=\frac{\Delta \theta_{magnified}}{\Delta \theta_{unmagnified}} ##, is the magnification.
 
Last edited:
What happens if you Just use the lensmaker's formula. That would give you focal length and magnification.
 
rude man said:
What happens if you Just use the lensmaker's formula. That would give you focal length and magnification.
I think this one is best worked from first principles. The lensmaker's formula is for a thin lens.
 
Charles Link said:
I think this one is best worked from first principles. The lensmaker's formula is for a thin lens.
oh yeh - good point
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
9K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K