Finding the parametric equation of a plane

  • Thread starter Thread starter rafehi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parametric Plane
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the parametric equations of planes given specific points and vectors. For the first plane, the correct cartesian equation is established, but confusion arises in deriving the parametric form, with suggestions to find two additional points in the plane that are not parallel to each other. The second part involves using the normal vector of a plane to find a new plane's equation through a given point, emphasizing that two planes with the same normal vector are parallel. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the geometric relationships between points, vectors, and planes to derive accurate equations. Overall, the thread provides insights into the methods for determining both cartesian and parametric forms of plane equations.
rafehi
Messages
48
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Find the equation of the following planes in cartesian and (vector) parametric form:
a) the plane through the point (1,4,5) and perpendicular to the vector (7,1,4)
b) the plane through the origin and the points (1,1,1) and (1,2,3)


The Attempt at a Solution



For part a)
I found the cartesian form of the equation using a(x-x0) + b(y-y0) + c(z-z0), to give:
7(x-1) + 1(y-4) + 4(z-5) = 0, which expands to:
7x + y + 4z = 31, which is correct.

However, I've no idea how to find the parametric form. The answer is given as r = (1,4,5) + s(4,0,-7) + t(0,4-1).

Any help on how I'd go about answering this question?

For part b)
To find the cartesian form, I found the vectors from the origin to (1, 1, 1,) and (1, 2, 3), using V1->V2 = V2 - V1, giving me V0->V1= (1,1,1) and V0->V2 = (1,2,3). Using the cross product to get the orthogonal, then dotting that with (0,0,0) gives the correct equation, x-2y+z=0, which is correct.

Again, I've got no idea how to find the parametric equation.

Any help would be greatly appreciated. These aren't assignment questions or anything like that - just revision for my L.A exam next week.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's pluck a plane out of the air: x + 3y - 7z = 20.

To find the parametric equations for x, y and z is just to solve the equation as you would simultaneous equations, remember that?

One equation, three unknowns => 3-1=2 parameters. Let z=t, y = s, so x = 20 - 3y + 7z = 20 - 3s + 7t. Hence (x, y, z) = (20 - 3s + 7t, s, t) = (20, 0, 0) + (-3, 1, 0)s + (7, 0 , 1)t.
 
For a, for the parametric form you want, you have one point in the plane, Q(1, 4, 5). You need to find two additional points in the plane, call them R and S.

The points R and S should be such that QR is not parallel to QS.

Then any point in the plane satisfies P = OQ + r*QR + s*QS.

Here's what's going on geometrically. To get from the origin to any point in the plane, I have to get to some point on the plane (OQ does that), and from there, some linear combination of QR and QS gets me to the exact point. The parameters of this parametric form are r and s.
 
Unco said:
Let's pluck a plane out of the air: x + 3y - 7z = 20.

To find the parametric equations for x, y and z is just to solve the equation as you would simultaneous equations, remember that?

One equation, three unknowns => 3-1=2 parameters. Let z=t, y = s, so x = 20 - 3y + 7z = 20 - 3s + 7t. Hence (x, y, z) = (20 - 3s + 7t, s, t) = (20, 0, 0) + (-3, 1, 0)s + (7, 0 , 1)t.

Applying this method to a), I get (x,y,z)=(31-4t-7s,s,t)= (31,0,0)+(-7,1,0)+(-4,0,1), which differs from the answer given (shown in the OP). How would we answer the question without having to use a different position (as seems to be the expectation in all the questions)?
 
Mark44 said:
For a, for the parametric form you want, you have one point in the plane, Q(1, 4, 5). You need to find two additional points in the plane, call them R and S.

The points R and S should be such that QR is not parallel to QS.

Then any point in the plane satisfies P = OQ + r*QR + s*QS.

Here's what's going on geometrically. To get from the origin to any point in the plane, I have to get to some point on the plane (OQ does that), and from there, some linear combination of QR and QS gets me to the exact point. The parameters of this parametric form are r and s.

OK, I get that much. But how would be find the points QR and QS?

I'm guessing one possible method would be to use the dot product, such that QR . (7,1,4) and QS . (7,1,4) = 0. Is there an easier approach to the question (and one that doesn't give me infinite possible solutions, which I'm guessing would make life pretty hard for the examiner:devil:)?

Thank you both for your help.
 
rafehi said:
Applying this method to a), I get (x,y,z)=(31-4t-7s,s,t)= (31,0,0)+(-7,1,0)+(-4,0,1), which differs from the answer given (shown in the OP). How would we answer the question without having to use a different position (as seems to be the expectation in all the questions)?
Your answer is incorrect because taking s= t= 0 gives (31, 0, 0) which does NOT satisfy 7x- y+ 4z= 31. Did you forget to divide by 7? Solving the cartesian equation for x we have x= (y- 4z+ 31)/7 and, taking y and z as the parameters, y= s, z= t, x= (s- 4t+ 31)/7 so
r= ((s- 4t+ 31)/7, s, t)= (31/7, 0, 0)+ (1/7, 1, 0)s+ (-4/7, 0, 1)t.

There exist an infinite number of parametric equations for anything because the choice of parameter is arbitrary. I, because I dislike fractions, might have chosen to solve for y rather than x: y= x+ 4z- 31 so taking x= s, z= t, r= (s, s+ 4t- 31, t)= (0, -31, 0)+ (1, 1, 0)s+ (0, 4, 1)t.

In the answer your book gives, r = (1,4,5) + s(4,0,-7) + t(0,4,-1), they have not solved the cartesian equation but worked directly from the given information. Any point in the plane can be written as a single point in the plane (and (1, 4, 5) is given) plus a linear combination of two independent vectors in the plane. Any vector on the plane must be perpendicular to (7, 1, 4) and we can be sure two vectors are independent by taking one (1, 0, a) and the other (0, 1, b). For what a is (1, 0, a) perpendicular to (7, 1, 4)? We must have 7+ 4a= 0 or a= -7/4. (1, 0, -7/4) will do, or since I dislike fractions, (4, 0, -7). A vector of the form (0, 1, b)is perpendicular to (7, 1, 4) if 1+ 4b= 0 so b= -1/4. Such a vector is (0, 1, -1/4) as well as (0, 4, -1). We can write any point on the plane as the intial point, (1, 4, 5) plus a linear combination of those two vectors in the plane: (1, 4, 5)+ (4, 0, -7)s+ (0, 4, -1)t.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Your answer is incorrect because taking s= t= 0 gives (31, 0, 0) which does NOT satisfy 7x- y+ 4z= 31. Did you forget to divide by 7? Solving the cartesian equation for x we have x= (y- 4z+ 31)/7 and, taking y and z as the parameters, y= s, z= t, x= (s- 4t+ 31)/7 so
r= ((s- 4t+ 31)/7, s, t)= (31/7, 0, 0)+ (1/7, 1, 0)s+ (-4/7, 0, 1)t.

There exist an infinite number of parametric equations for anything because the choice of parameter is arbitrary. I, because I dislike fractions, might have chosen to solve for y rather than x: y= x+ 4z- 31 so taking x= s, z= t, r= (s, s+ 4t- 31, t)= (0, -31, 0)+ (1, 1, 0)s+ (0, 4, 1)t.

In the answer your book gives, r = (1,4,5) + s(4,0,-7) + t(0,4,-1), they have not solved the cartesian equation but worked directly from the given information. Any point in the plane can be written as a single point in the plane (and (1, 4, 5) is given) plus a linear combination of two independent vectors in the plane. Any vector on the plane must be perpendicular to (7, 1, 4) and we can be sure two vectors are independent by taking one (1, 0, a) and the other (0, 1, b). For what a is (1, 0, a) perpendicular to (7, 1, 4)? We must have 7+ 4a= 0 or a= -7/4. (1, 0, -7/4) will do, or since I dislike fractions, (4, 0, -7). A vector of the form (0, 1, b)is perpendicular to (7, 1, 4) if 1+ 4b= 0 so b= -1/4. Such a vector is (0, 1, -1/4) as well as (0, 4, -1). We can write any point on the plane as the intial point, (1, 4, 5) plus a linear combination of those two vectors in the plane: (1, 4, 5)+ (4, 0, -7)s+ (0, 4, -1)t.

Thanks heaps for clearing that up, HoI. On your first paragraph, I did solve for y and let x and z equal arbitrary constants, but I apparently wrote the order as (y,x,z) instead of (x,y,z). :redface:
 
Alright - one more question.

If we're given a point and a vector parallel to the plane, how would we find the vector equation?

The question is: Find the vector equation of the plane through the point (6, 5, -2) and parallel to the plane x + y - z + 1 = 0.

How I went about solving it was find a vector perpendicular to the plane using the dot product:
(a,b,c).(1,1,-1)=0.
(a,b,c)=(1,0,1) satisfies the above, thus it is perpendicular to the plane.

Finding two vectors perpendicular to this (or one, as we already have a parallel vector) would allow us to make a linear combination along the plane and thus define the plane.
So:
(a,b,c).(1,0,1)=0
Therefore, (a,b,c)=(1,0,-1), with only the one possible independent vector, using the parallel vector given in the question:
(6,5,-2) + s(1,0,-1) + t(1,1,-1) (equation of the plane)

However, the answer given is:
(6,5,-2) + s(1,0,1) + t(0,1,1)
Now both the vectors used in the equation are perpendicular to the plane, so how is it possible that the above is an equation for the plane? Unless I'm missing something, I'm guessing it's just an error on their behalf?
 
rafehi said:
Alright - one more question.

If we're given a point and a vector parallel to the plane, how would we find the vector equation?

The question is: Find the vector equation of the plane through the point (6, 5, -2) and parallel to the plane x + y - z + 1 = 0.
If two planes are parallel, they have the same normal vector. Find the plane containing (6, 5, -2) with normal vector <1, 1, -1>. You seem to be forgetting that for a plane written as Ax+ By+ Cz= constant, <A, B, C> is the normal vector.

(x- 6)+ (y- 5)- (z+ 2)= 0 so x+ y- z= 13 is the "Cartesian" equation. Solving form z, z= x+ y- 13 so x= s, y= t, z= s+ t- 13 are parametric equations for the plane and <0, 0, -13>+ <1, 0, 1>s+ <0, 1, 1>t is a vector equation.

How I went about solving it was find a vector perpendicular to the plane using the dot product:
(a,b,c).(1,1,-1)=0.
(a,b,c)=(1,0,1) satisfies the above, thus it is perpendicular to the plane.
No. (1, 1, -1) itself is perpendicular to the given plane.

Finding two vectors perpendicular to this (or one, as we already have a parallel vector) would allow us to make a linear combination along the plane and thus define the plane.
So:
(a,b,c).(1,0,1)=0
Therefore, (a,b,c)=(1,0,-1), with only the one possible independent vector, using the parallel vector given in the question:
(6,5,-2) + s(1,0,-1) + t(1,1,-1) (equation of the plane)

However, the answer given is:
(6,5,-2) + s(1,0,1) + t(0,1,1)
Now both the vectors used in the equation are perpendicular to the plane, so how is it possible that the above is an equation for the plane? Unless I'm missing something, I'm guessing it's just an error on their behalf?
Again, (1, 1, -1) is perpendicular to the given plane so (x, y, z) is parallel to the plane if and only if x+ y- z= 0. z= x+ y in that case. Taking x= 1, y= 0, z= 1 so (1, 0, 1) is parallel to the plane. Taking x= 0, y= 1, z= 1 so (0, 1, 1) is parallel to the plane. Since (6, 5, -2) is a point in the plane, (6,5, -2)+ s(1, 0, 1) is in the plane for all s and (6, 5, -2)+ t(0,1,1) is in the plane: since the plane is two dimensional all points in the plane are of the form (6, 5, -2)+ s(1, 0, 1)+ t(0, 1, 1) for all s and t.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
You really are a legend HoI. The section is barely covered in the textbook and we skimmed over it in the lectures. Thanks heaps for your help. *insert thumbs up smilie here*
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K