MHB Finding the point on a parabola closest to the origin

Click For Summary
To find the point on the parabola defined by 2y² = 5(x + 1) that is closest to the origin (0,0), the discussion emphasizes minimizing the square of the distance function D = x² + y². The approach involves substituting the expression for x in terms of y into the distance function, leading to f(y) = ((2/5)y² - 1)² + y². Differentiating this function with respect to y and setting the derivative to zero helps identify critical points. The conversation also touches on the feasibility of solving for y while constraining with x, noting that it may complicate the problem.
leprofece
Messages
239
Reaction score
0
Find the curve coordinates of the point nearest to P in the curve
2y2 = 5(x+1) P(0,0)
Book answer (-1,0)

ok (x-0)2+ (y-0)2 = D
D = (x)2+ (y)2
and (y)2 = -x2

Now -x2 = 5/2(x+1)

But derivating I don't get the answer or ansa
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: max and min 317

isn't the formula like

$$\sqrt{(x -0)^2 + (y- 0)^2} = D$$ ?

I think you forgot the square root . I'm not sure though but I think that cancels your squares in the end
 
leprofece, Please use thread titles that describe the problem.

You can in fact minimize the square of the distance for simplification of the computation:

$$f(x,y)=x^2+y^2$$

constrained by:

$$x=\frac{2}{5}y^2-1$$

So, substituting for $x$ into the objective function, we find:

$$f(y)=\left(\frac{2}{5}y^2-1 \right)^2+y^2$$

Now, differentiate with respect to $y$ and equate the result to zero to find the critical value.
 
MarkFL said:
leprofece, Please use thread titles that describe the problem.

You can in fact minimize the square of the distance for simplification of the computation:

$$f(x,y)=x^2+y^2$$

constrained by:

$$x=\frac{2}{5}y^2-1$$

So, substituting for $x$ into the objective function, we find:

$$f(y)=\left(\frac{2}{5}y^2-1 \right)^2+y^2$$

Now, differentiate with respect to $y$ and equate the result to zero to find the critical value.

One Thing
Can I solve for y and constrain with x instead of y how you did?
 
leprofece said:
One Thing
Can I solve for y and constrain with x instead of y how you did?

Yes, but then you run into a "problem." Try it and see...:D

It is still workable, but becomes a boundary problem like the circle problem you recently posted.
 
Thread 'Problem with calculating projections of curl using rotation of contour'
Hello! I tried to calculate projections of curl using rotation of coordinate system but I encountered with following problem. Given: ##rot_xA=\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial z}=0## ##rot_yA=\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial x}=1## ##rot_zA=\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial y}=0## I rotated ##yz##-plane of this coordinate system by an angle ##45## degrees about ##x##-axis and used rotation matrix to...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K