Finding the Real Points of a Complex Function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding conditions under which a complex expression related to a band pass filter becomes entirely real. The expression involves variables R, L, and C, and is part of a circuit analysis problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore methods to manipulate the expression, including multiplying by the complex conjugate and equating phase angles. Some question the handling of imaginary components in the denominator.

Discussion Status

Some participants have shared their attempts and insights, with one noting a successful realization regarding phase angles. Others continue to discuss the implications of manipulating the expression and the presence of imaginary components.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of circuit design, specifically focusing on a band pass filter without the use of active components. There is mention of specific configurations and the need for a real output voltage.

mrb427
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I'm trying to solve the following expression for w when w is entirely real (no imaginary component). It is part of a circuits problem where I have to design a band pass filter. Note that I'm using j instead of i to denote the imaginary component.

\frac{jwLR+\frac{L}{C}+\frac{R}{jwC}}{R+\frac{1}{jwC}}

To be clear, I'm only looking for a relationship between R, L, and C which would cause the above expression to be entirely real. This is basically the solution for the resonant frequency of my circuit. So w at resonance equals some relationship of R, L, and C. I really appreciate any help with this.

For anyone who is interested, this is my result for the transfer function (Vout/Vin) of an RLC combination I'm trying. The RLC configuration is L in series with R and C in parallel. In my case, the pure series RLC bandpass filter will not work as it yields an output voltage below what is required and I cannot use active components.

Thanks,
mrb427
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
try multiplying the numerator & denominator by the complex conjugate of the denominator
 
Tried that and didn't get too far. Actually I just managed to solve this by realizing that the phase angle of the numerator must equal the phase angle of the denominator. Thanks for the reply though! Hopefully this will help someone in the future.

Remember, the phase angle of the numerator equals the phase angle of the denominator! By setting the two equal you can find the relation that yields a real result.
 
good you got an answer using phase angles

I usullay find it easiest just to multiply as below, which makes the denominator will be real. The imaginary part is then written explicitly
\frac{jwLR+\frac{L}{C}+\frac{R}{jwC}}{R+\frac{1}{j wC}}<br /> <br /> = \frac{jwLR+\frac{L}{C}+\frac{R}{jwC}}{R+\frac{1}{j wC}} <br /> <br /> \frac{R-\frac{1}{j wC}}{R-\frac{1}{j wC}}<br /> <br />
 
Yeah, when I tried that I forgot that I could bring j out of a denominator and put it in the numerator if I multiplied by -1. If you don't remember that you can't factor the j's out and set that part equal to zero.
 
there shouldn't be any j's in the denominator, multipying by the complex conjugate is finding the magintude square which is always a positive real number

(R+\frac{1}{j wC})(R-\frac{1}{j wC})<br /> = R^2 +R \frac{1}{j wC}-R\frac{1}{j wC} -(\frac{1}{j wC})^2<br /> = R^2 +(\frac{1}{ wC})^2
 
I meant the fractions which are left in the numerator after multiplying by the complex conjugate.
 
Remember, 1/j = -j.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
934