MHB Finding the Resultant Angle for Vector Addition Using Law of Sines and Cosines

  • Thread starter Thread starter bergausstein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resultant
bergausstein
Messages
191
Reaction score
0
please help me solve the problem graphically,

what I know is that eventually I 'm going to be using law of sine and law of cosine for this problem. my problem is how to determine the necessary angle to be used in that method.

this is how far I can get to, I use parallelogram rule and I'm stuck. please help.

find R and $\theta_R$
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    5.1 KB · Views: 119
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you put the tail of $\vec{F}_2$ on the tip of $\vec{F}_1$, you can perform vector addition, right? How do you perform vector addition?
 
Ackbach said:
If you put the tail of $\vec{F}_2$ on the tip of $\vec{F}_1$, you can perform vector addition, right? How do you perform vector addition?

triangle rule
 
yes using triangle I can add them. But I can't see the proper angle to be use in doing that. please tell me how go about finding that angle.
 
bergausstein said:
yes using triangle I can add them. But I can't see the proper angle to be use in doing that. please tell me how go about finding that angle.
You know that the angle between $\vec{F_1}$ and the horizontal is $30^\circ$. The angle between $\vec{F_2}$ and the horizontal is $45^\circ + 90^\circ$. The difference between those two angles is the angle between $\vec{F_1}$ and $\vec{F_2}$.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top