Finding the shape of a hanging rope

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the optimal shape of a hanging rope, suggesting the use of integrals to minimize the area while considering the slope and material length. The integral approach involves calculating the length and potential energy of the rope, emphasizing the need for constraints related to the string length to achieve a minimum. Participants recommend researching the catenary curve and the principle of least action, noting that the latter is more accurately described as the principle of stationary action. Clarifications are made regarding the necessity of minimizing potential energy rather than applying the principle of least action in a dynamic context. The conversation highlights the importance of imposing additional constraints to effectively solve the problem.
sap
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
given two poles at a distance between them and a rope that it's length is bigger than the distance between them, describe the shape of the rope.
Relevant Equations
no relevent equations
i started to think to maybe do an integral to find the minimum area, and then I thought that the area itself is not sufficient because there is more material depending on the slope. so I thought to do an integral depending on the length instead of x.
##dh^{2}=dx^{2}+dy^{2}##

##\int{}f(x)dh= \int{}f(x)\sqrt{dx^{2}+dy^{2}}##
##dy=\frac{dy}{dx}dx=dx f'(x)##
##\int{}f(x)\sqrt{dx^{2}+f'(x)^{2}dx^{2}}=\int{}f(x)\sqrt{f'(x)^{2}+1} dx^{2}##
how can I get a minimum to solvw this question?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can edit your post to fix latex issues rather than constantly making an entirely new post.
 
Look up the catenary and the principle of least action.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and PhDeezNutz
You only have an integral describing the potential energy but without restrictions on the string length. In order to find an actual minimum of the potential energy, you will furthermore need to impose additional constraints for the string length. There are several ways in which you can do this.

docnet said:
Look up the catenary and the principle of least action.
Nothing is moving here so the principle of stationary* action is not really needed. Only minimizing the potential energy.

* The ”principle of least action” is a misnomer. It is more accurate to use ”stationary” as the solution may be a maximum or saddle point as well.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top