Undergrad Finding the time for the first shock for a quasilinear first order PDE

Click For Summary
To find the first shock wave in a quasilinear first-order PDE, the method involves solving the equation x_ξ = 0, which indicates where neighboring characteristics intersect. This intersection occurs when characteristics corresponding to nearby values of ξ meet, leading to the formation of a shock. An example discussed highlights that while characteristics may intersect, they do not always indicate the first shock unless they are neighboring and the time t is minimal. The conclusion drawn is that setting x_ξ = 0 effectively determines the position of the first shock, as it arises from closely spaced characteristics. This method is validated through the analysis of specific PDE examples and their characteristics.
BloonAinte
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
To find a shock wave, do we always solve the equation ##x_{\xi}=0##? The PDEs I consider are of the form ##u_t + g(u) u_x = f(u)##, with initial condition ##u(x,0) = h(x)##.
To find a shock wave, do we always solve the equation ##x_{\xi}=0##? The PDEs I consider are of the form ##u_t + g(u) u_x = f(u)##, with initial condition ##u(x,0) = h(x)##. I have been looking at the solutions for problems in my homework sheet but this method was used with no explanation.

Why does this method work to find the formation of the first shock?

Thank you very much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A shock forms when neighbouring charcteristics first intersect. Characteristics corresponding to neighbouring values of \xi will intersect when (x(\xi,t),t) = (x(\xi + \delta \xi, t), t) which to first order in \delta \xi requires \frac{\partial x}{\partial \xi} = 0.
 
Thank you! Does this method always determine the first shock?

I have looked up an example to illustrate my doubt:

https://math.stackexchange.com/ques...-curve-and-sketch-characteristics-in-xt-plane

That question considers some PDE and obtains characteristics as follows:
IOfH2.png

In this question, the characteristics for ##x > 0.5## intersect those for ##x < -0.5##. These are not neighbouring characteristics, but they have intersections. However, ##t## is not minimal there, so it's not the position of the first shock. These also do not seem to solve ##x_{\xi} = 0##.

From this "investigation", I guess that this means that this method of setting ##x_{\xi}=0## will always give the position of the first shock, and this always occurs due to characteristics which are close together.

Does this sound accurate? Thank you!
 
This example is complicated by the fact that x_\xi does not exist at \xi = 0. In this case, a characteristic in \xi &gt; 0 intersects the characteristic x = 0 when <br /> t = \frac{2\xi}{2 - \xi}. This first happens at <br /> \max \left\{ 0, \inf_{\xi \geq 0} \frac{2\xi}{2 - \xi} \right\} = 0.
 
Thank you so much for all your help! :) I understand this more now ^^
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K