Quasilinear Equation but with non-zero initial condition?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LieToMe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Condition Initial
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
LieToMe
Messages
31
Reaction score
3
The way I was taught to solve many quasi-linear PDEs was by harnessing the initial condition in the characteristic method at ##u(x,0) = f(x)##. What if however I need use alternative initial conditions such as ##u(x,y=c) = f(x)## for some constant ##c##? Can the solution be propagated the same way?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
on Phys.org
BvU said:
What do you think of shifting the ##y##-axis and solving two different initial value problems (one backwards equation) ?
I think that sounds reasonable but I want to make sure.
 
LieToMe said:
The way I was taught to solve many quasi-linear PDEs was by harnessing the initial condition in the characteristic method at ##u(x,0) = f(x)##. What if however I need use alternative initial conditions such as ##u(x,y=c) = f(x)## for some constant ##c##? Can the solution be propagated the same way?
Yes - you can use [itex](x, v = y - c)[/itex] as your independent variable instead of [itex](x,y)[/itex]. (Or use [itex](x, c - y)[/itex] if you need to work back to [itex]y = 0[/itex].)