Finding the value of the element dq

  • Thread starter Thread starter warrior_1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Element Value
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the expression for the element of charge, dq, within an infinitesimally thin spherical shell of radius r. The original poster seeks clarification on why dq is represented as rho(r)*4*pi*(r)^2dr, where dr is the thickness of the shell.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to relate total charge to charge density and volume, leading to a differentiation approach to find dq. Some participants express uncertainty about the differentiation of rho(r) and seek further explanation.

Discussion Status

Some participants affirm the original poster's approach as correct, while others provide additional context regarding the treatment of rho as a constant. The discussion includes various interpretations of the problem and attempts to clarify the mathematical reasoning involved.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the need for a more intuitive explanation of the relationship between the spherical shell's geometry and the charge density, as well as the implications of treating rho as a constant versus a variable.

warrior_1
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi guys, i need a bit of help with the following question. Ok the question states the following, explain why the element of charge, dq, located within an infinitesimally thin spherical shell or radius r is equal to rho(r)*4*pi*(r)^2dr, where dr is the thickness of the shell.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


ok i know that total charge is equal to charge density multiplied by volume, which is equal to rho*4/3pi*r^2. Hence if i were to find dq, i would have to differentiate with respect to r, dq/dr and solve for dq... thus dq/dr=rho(r)*dv/dr
where dv/dr=4*pi*r^2, therefore if i solve for dq i should get dq=rho(r)*4*pi*r^2*dr...

ok i have no idea if that was right or not... any help here would be greatly appreciated and also why don't we differentiate rho(r)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
*bump*
 
yeah i kinda need help with a question very similar to this... i have the same basic idea as warror_1 but I am still unsure as to how to explain it
 
Yes, that approach is right. And we do don't differentiate rho because it's a constant, not a function.

As for explaining it, you don't need to; the OP's equations prove what the question asked to prove, so they're perfectly sufficient. For a more intuitive explanation, think of adding an extra layer of thickness dr on top of a sphere of radius r. If you flatten out the sphere onto a map, it would have an area of 4pi*r^2; with the extra layer, it would be 4pi*(r+dr)^2. If dr is small, there's no difference in their size, so now you have two layers of equal shape and area separated by distance dr. The volume of contained in that is 4pi*r2dr, so the contained charge must be rho*4pi*r2dr
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
4K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K