MHB Finding the zero vector of a sinusoidal set

Apricity
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

Thank you in advance for taking the time to read my question and for your help. I really appreciate it.

The question is set out as follows:

Given the set

𝑆 = {π‘Ž sin (π‘₯+𝑏) | π‘Ž, 𝑏 E R}.

The addition of elements 𝒔1, 𝒔2 ∈ 𝑆 is defined as follows:

𝒔1 +𝒔2 =π‘Ž1 sin (π‘₯+𝑏1)+π‘Ž2 sin (π‘₯+𝑏2)

=(π‘Ž1cosπ‘₯sin𝑏1 +π‘Ž1sinπ‘₯cos𝑏1)+(π‘Ž2cosπ‘₯sin𝑏2 +π‘Ž2sinπ‘₯cos𝑏2)
= (π‘Ž1 sin 𝑏1 + π‘Ž2 sin 𝑏2) cos π‘₯ + (π‘Ž1 cos 𝑏1 + π‘Ž2 cos 𝑏2) sin π‘₯
= π‘Ž3 sin(π‘₯ + 𝑏3),

Where
π‘Ž3 = βˆšπ‘Ž12 + π‘Ž22 + 2π‘Ž1π‘Ž2 cos(𝑏1 βˆ’ 𝑏2), and
tan𝑏3 = π‘Ž1sin𝑏1+π‘Ž2sin𝑏2/π‘Ž1 cos 𝑏1+π‘Ž2 cos 𝑏2

The scalar multiplication is defined as:

πœ†π’”1 = πœ†π‘Ž1 sin(π‘₯ + 𝑏1).

Find the following vectors in 𝑆:
οΏΌοΏΌa. The zero vector
b. The negative of
c. The vector
d. The vector
e. The vectorI understand that these are phasors with the same frequency and different amplitude and phase. I also understand the definition of the zero vector which is:

Given a vector u, and a vector v,
u+v=u=v+u

I just don't know where to go from here to find the requested vectors. I have researched online for two days and I can't seem to understand the process. Please help me!

Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
functions of the form "a sin(x+ b)" are a subset of the set of "all functions" and the addition you describe is the "usual" addition of functions- that is, this is a subspace of the space of all functions and so has the same "zero vector", the "zero function", f(x)= 0 for all x. Specifically that is the function a sin(x+ b) with a= 0.
 
Thanks for your reply HallsofIvy..That was my conclusion too... I thought the only way a sinusoidal wave can be zero is if it's amplitude is zero, but somehow I was complicating myself unnecessarily... It just seemed too simple ...

Thanks again
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • Β· Replies 9 Β·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Β· Replies 7 Β·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • Β· Replies 26 Β·
Replies
26
Views
685
  • Β· Replies 9 Β·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Β· Replies 2 Β·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Β· Replies 5 Β·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Β· Replies 5 Β·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Β· Replies 3 Β·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • Β· Replies 3 Β·
Replies
3
Views
2K