Finding thickness of a thin film question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the thickness of a thin film of oil on pavement, with specific wavelengths of light reflecting differently due to interference effects. The subject area pertains to optics, specifically the behavior of light in thin films and interference patterns.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to use equations for constructive and destructive interference to find the thickness of the oil film. Some participants question the correctness of the formulas used, suggesting a potential mix-up between the conditions for constructive and destructive interference.

Discussion Status

The discussion is exploring the validity of the interference equations. Some participants have provided verification of the formulas, indicating a productive exchange of ideas, though no consensus on the correct application has been reached yet.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a textbook reference that may influence the understanding of the formulas, and participants are navigating the implications of phase changes in the context of thin film interference.

feelau
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A thin film of oil (n = 1.23) is located on a smooth, wet pavement. When viewed perpendicular to the pavement, the film reflects most strongly red light at 640 nm and reflects no light at 569 nm. How thick is the oil film?


Homework Equations


2nt=(m+.5)*(wavelength)------constructive interference
2nt=m* wavelength------------destructive interference
n=index of refraction
t= thickness
m= order number

The Attempt at a Solution


So I tried to set the two equations together and using the corresponding wavelengths to solve for m. Next I just plugged m into one of the equations and using the corresponding wavelength to find t. Is that the correct method of doing this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe you have the formulas for constructive and destructive interference reversed somewhat. They should be:

Constructive: 2nt = m\lambda

Destructive: 2nt = (m-1/2)\lambda
 
Hm I think they are the same thing. My textbook says it's that way, the only difference is the 90 degree phase change. But would be method be correct?
 
Yes, I guess they are both correct. Just in case you were wondering I looked up the formulas for thin films posted above in Knight's Physics book.(Not my favorite, but the only one I had on me.) Sorry for any confusion I may have caused.
 
Last edited:
np thanks for the verification
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K