Finding unitary operator associated with a given Hamiltonian

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the unitary operator \( U(t) = \exp(-i \omega \sigma_1 t) \) associated with a given Hamiltonian represented by the Pauli matrix \( \sigma_1 \). The matrix representation of \( U(t) \) in the eigenbasis \( \{ |+\rangle, |-\rangle \} \) is established, leading to the expressions \( \langle 0 | U(t) | 0 \rangle = e^{-i \omega t} \) and \( \langle 1 | U(t) | 1 \rangle = e^{i \omega t} \). The discussion highlights the need to express \( U(t) \) in the original basis \( \{|0\rangle, |1\rangle\} \) and suggests using the properties of the Pauli matrix and linear combinations to resolve the issue of incorrect matrix representation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and Hamiltonians
  • Familiarity with Pauli matrices, specifically \( \sigma_1 \)
  • Knowledge of unitary operators and their properties
  • Proficiency in linear algebra, particularly eigenvalues and eigenvectors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of unitary operators in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the properties and applications of Pauli matrices
  • Explore the exponential of matrices and power series expansions
  • Investigate the relationship between different quantum bases and their transformations
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers working on quantum computing or quantum information theory will benefit from this discussion.

ubergewehr273
Messages
139
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
Given a Hamiltonian ##H = \hbar \omega \sigma_1##, you are supposed to find the associated time-evolution unitary operator ##U(t)##.
Relevant Equations
Time-independent Schrodinger's equation

$$-i \hbar \frac{\partial | \psi (t) \rangle}{\partial t} = \hat{H} | \psi (t) \rangle$$

The associated unitary operator is

$$U(t) = \exp (\frac{-i \hat{H} t}{\hbar})$$
Now from the relevant equations,
$$U(t) = \exp(-i \omega \sigma_1 t)$$

which is easy to compute provided the Hamiltonian is diagonalized. Writing ##\sigma_1## in its eigenbasis, we get

$$\sigma_1 =
\begin{pmatrix}
1 & 0\\
0 & -1\\
\end{pmatrix}
$$

and hence the unitary ##U(t)## becomes

$$U(t) =
\begin{pmatrix}
e^{-i \omega t} & 0\\
0 & e^{i \omega t}\\
\end{pmatrix}
$$

Mind you that the above representation of $U(t)$ is in the basis ##\{ |+\rangle, |-\rangle\}## where

$$ |+\rangle =
\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}
\begin{pmatrix}
1\\
1\\
\end{pmatrix}
$$

$$ |-\rangle =
\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}
\begin{pmatrix}
1\\
-1\\
\end{pmatrix}
$$

Now, I need to write ##U(t)## back in the original basis ##\{|0\rangle, |1\rangle\}## (which is where I'm facing an issue). Finding the components of the above expression for ##U(t)## in the original basis,

$$\langle 0 | U(t) | 0 \rangle = e^{-i \omega t} \qquad \langle 1 | U(t) | 1 \rangle = e^{i \omega t}$$

with ##\langle 0 | U(t) | 1 \rangle = 0## and ##\langle 1 | U(t) | 0 \rangle = 0##. This gives me the exact same matrix representation in the original basis. Obviously this is not true and I'm doing something wrong.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For inline Latex you need to use double hashes rather than single dollars.
 
ubergewehr273 said:
Finding the components of the above expression for ##U(t)## in the original basis,

$$\langle 0 | U(t) | 0 \rangle = e^{-i \omega t} \qquad \langle 1 | U(t) | 1 \rangle = e^{i \omega t}$$

with ##\langle 0 | U(t) | 1 \rangle = 0## and ##\langle 1 | U(t) | 0 \rangle = 0##. This gives me the exact same matrix representation in the original basis. Obviously this is not true and I'm doing something wrong.
You'll have to show your work, for instance ##\langle 0 | U(t) | 0 \rangle##, because the result you get is incorrect.
 
You can write your solution in terms of
$$\hat{U}=\exp(-\mathrm{i} \omega t) |+ \rangle \langle +| + \exp(\mathrm{i} \omega t) |- \rangle \langle -|.$$
Now simply express ##|+ \rangle## and ##|- \rangle## as linear combinations of ##|1 \rangle## and ##|0 \rangle## and multiply out the dyadic products. Then you can read out the matrix elements easily.

A much easier way is to directly use the properties of the Pauli matrix. All you need is ##\hat{\sigma}_1^2=1## and then write down the power series for the exponential function.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K