Finding unitary operator associated with a given Hamiltonian

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the unitary operator associated with a given Hamiltonian, specifically focusing on the operator \( U(t) = \exp(-i \omega \sigma_1 t) \) and its representation in different bases. The subject area includes quantum mechanics and linear algebra, particularly the properties of Pauli matrices.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to compute the unitary operator \( U(t) \) and express it in the original basis, but expresses confusion regarding the correctness of their results. Some participants question the validity of the matrix representation obtained in the original basis and suggest that the poster may be making an error.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering guidance on how to express the states in terms of the original basis and suggesting alternative approaches to simplify the calculations. There is a recognition of the need to clarify the steps taken to arrive at the results, indicating a productive direction in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the requirement to show work in the calculations, and participants note the importance of correctly applying the properties of the Pauli matrices in the context of the problem.

ubergewehr273
Messages
139
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
Given a Hamiltonian ##H = \hbar \omega \sigma_1##, you are supposed to find the associated time-evolution unitary operator ##U(t)##.
Relevant Equations
Time-independent Schrodinger's equation

$$-i \hbar \frac{\partial | \psi (t) \rangle}{\partial t} = \hat{H} | \psi (t) \rangle$$

The associated unitary operator is

$$U(t) = \exp (\frac{-i \hat{H} t}{\hbar})$$
Now from the relevant equations,
$$U(t) = \exp(-i \omega \sigma_1 t)$$

which is easy to compute provided the Hamiltonian is diagonalized. Writing ##\sigma_1## in its eigenbasis, we get

$$\sigma_1 =
\begin{pmatrix}
1 & 0\\
0 & -1\\
\end{pmatrix}
$$

and hence the unitary ##U(t)## becomes

$$U(t) =
\begin{pmatrix}
e^{-i \omega t} & 0\\
0 & e^{i \omega t}\\
\end{pmatrix}
$$

Mind you that the above representation of $U(t)$ is in the basis ##\{ |+\rangle, |-\rangle\}## where

$$ |+\rangle =
\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}
\begin{pmatrix}
1\\
1\\
\end{pmatrix}
$$

$$ |-\rangle =
\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}
\begin{pmatrix}
1\\
-1\\
\end{pmatrix}
$$

Now, I need to write ##U(t)## back in the original basis ##\{|0\rangle, |1\rangle\}## (which is where I'm facing an issue). Finding the components of the above expression for ##U(t)## in the original basis,

$$\langle 0 | U(t) | 0 \rangle = e^{-i \omega t} \qquad \langle 1 | U(t) | 1 \rangle = e^{i \omega t}$$

with ##\langle 0 | U(t) | 1 \rangle = 0## and ##\langle 1 | U(t) | 0 \rangle = 0##. This gives me the exact same matrix representation in the original basis. Obviously this is not true and I'm doing something wrong.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For inline Latex you need to use double hashes rather than single dollars.
 
ubergewehr273 said:
Finding the components of the above expression for ##U(t)## in the original basis,

$$\langle 0 | U(t) | 0 \rangle = e^{-i \omega t} \qquad \langle 1 | U(t) | 1 \rangle = e^{i \omega t}$$

with ##\langle 0 | U(t) | 1 \rangle = 0## and ##\langle 1 | U(t) | 0 \rangle = 0##. This gives me the exact same matrix representation in the original basis. Obviously this is not true and I'm doing something wrong.
You'll have to show your work, for instance ##\langle 0 | U(t) | 0 \rangle##, because the result you get is incorrect.
 
You can write your solution in terms of
$$\hat{U}=\exp(-\mathrm{i} \omega t) |+ \rangle \langle +| + \exp(\mathrm{i} \omega t) |- \rangle \langle -|.$$
Now simply express ##|+ \rangle## and ##|- \rangle## as linear combinations of ##|1 \rangle## and ##|0 \rangle## and multiply out the dyadic products. Then you can read out the matrix elements easily.

A much easier way is to directly use the properties of the Pauli matrix. All you need is ##\hat{\sigma}_1^2=1## and then write down the power series for the exponential function.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K