Finding Zeros of f(x)=x3-3x2-6x+8

  • Thread starter Thread starter math4life
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the zeros of the polynomial function f(x) = x³ - 3x² - 6x + 8. Participants are exploring methods to identify the roots of this cubic equation, including the use of the Rational Root Theorem and synthetic division.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to find the zeros by graphing and using trial and error with the Rational Root Theorem. They question the efficiency of this method and seek alternatives. Other participants suggest using synthetic division and polynomial long division after identifying a factor.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing various methods to find the zeros, with some guidance provided on using synthetic division and recognizing factors. There is an acknowledgment of the potential for more efficient approaches, but no consensus has been reached on a single method.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of specific values that may be zeros based on the back of the book, and the original poster expresses uncertainty about their approach and the meaning of their synthetic division results.

math4life
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


f(x)=x3-3x2-6x+8


Homework Equations


p/q=+-(1,2,4,8)
f(0)=8



The Attempt at a Solution


What is the fastest way to find the zeros? I have to graph it. The back of the book shows the zeros looking to be 4, -2, and most likely 1.5. I am assuming we use the rational zeros theorum to divide by factors of 8 in a trial and error fashion. After I divided by 4 synthetically I got 1,1,-2,0 which I then divided by -2 to get 1, -1, 0. What does this mean? Is there a more efficient way to do this than randomly try all the p/qs?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
f(1)=0, so you know x-1 is a factor. Either use synthetic division or regular old polynomial long division to get a quadratic. It should be pretty simple after that.
 
math4life said:
After I divided by 4 synthetically I got 1,1,-2,0 which I then divided by -2 to get 1, -1, 0. What does this mean?

It means that:
  • (x-4) and (1·x2 + 1·x - 2) are factors (using the 1,1,-2 as the coefficients, with 0 as the remainder.
  • (x+2) and (1·x - 1) are factors

Is there a more efficient way to do this than randomly try all the p/qs?
Well, you could combine that with the Rule of Signs to figure out something about the number of positive and negative roots. Also, it's probably easier to start with the smaller numbers (±1, ±2) since it's a little easier to check whether f(x)=0 for those, especially for x=±1. If you can find just one factor, the expression becomes a quadratic which is easier to solve.
 
Got it, thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K