Exploring the Inter-Relationship of Nature's Constants

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the fine structure constant (α), which is a fundamental dimensionless constant in physics, approximately equal to 1/137. Participants explore its significance in electrodynamics and its connections to other constants, such as Planck's constant and the Bohr radius. There is curiosity about the reasons for its specific value and its potential relationships with other mathematical constants like Pi and e. The conversation also encourages the sharing of additional expressions that illustrate the inter-relationships among various natural constants. Overall, the thread highlights the complexity and intrigue surrounding fundamental constants in physics.
jsc314159
Messages
18
Reaction score
1
Hello all.

I only have a few posts here so I am somewhat new to the forum. I have been reading a number of the posts though and I am favorably impressed by many of the responses. I am also somewhat new to LaTex so please forgive my mistakes with it.

I am interested in learning more about the fine structure constant \alpha, where

\alpha = e^2/\hbar c \sim 1/137

e = elementary charge

\hbar = h/2\pi, h is Planck's constant

c = the speed of light in a vacuum

Another way of writing the fine structure constant is

\alpha = \frac{\hbar/mc}{a_0}

m = mass of an electron

a_0 = the Bohr radius

I understand that the fine structure constant is dimensionless and is one of those enigmatic fundamental constants that pops up in the study of nature.

I further understand that it is used in electrodynamics, how? Where else is it used?

What are the leading explanations as to why it exists and why it might take on the value it has?

Does it relate to other numbers like Pi, e, the number of spatial dimensions in the universe?

What do you think?

John
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes mzh62
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry, I didn't know a thread already existed on this topic. I suppose that is what the search function for.

jsc
 
Hello John,

You have laid out the basics for calculating the fine structure constant and may be interested in some further information about the constants of nature given on the website at the following link: (...) - Please read the attachment for my full reply -

... So the inter-linking of the constants seems to be open to expansion in line with specific theories, and the constants themselves appear to be constants of dimension in some cases, providing the mathematical link between expressions of different fields of physics, and in other cases definite parameters to associate with specific body and particle, for example Planck’s constant is the angular momentum of the electron.

Do you John, and others, have some more expressions extending the inter-relationship between the constants of nature?

Adc-fc
 

Attachments

Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K