Finite Abelian Group: Showing Isomorphism & Subgroups of Order/Index p

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on demonstrating the isomorphism between the quotient group A/A^p and the subgroup A_p of a finite abelian group A, where p is a prime. The proof involves defining a p-power homomorphism and analyzing the intersection of subgroups A^p and A_p. The conclusion asserts that A can be decomposed into the direct product of A_p and A^p, confirming that the number of subgroups of order p equals the number of subgroups of index p. The discussion also clarifies the equivalence of direct and semi-direct products in the context of abelian groups.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of finite abelian groups and their properties
  • Familiarity with group homomorphisms and kernels
  • Knowledge of cyclic groups and their orders
  • Basic concepts of group decomposition and isomorphism
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the structure theorem for finitely generated abelian groups
  • Learn about group homomorphisms and their applications in group theory
  • Explore the concepts of direct and semi-direct products in group theory
  • Investigate the properties of cyclic groups and their role in group decomposition
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in group theory, algebra students, and researchers interested in the structure of finite abelian groups and their subgroups.

NanoSaur
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Suppose A is a finite abelian group and p is a prime. A^p={a^p : a in A} and A_p={x:x^p=1,x in A}.
How to show A/A^p is isomorphic to A_p.
I tried to define a p-power map between A/A^p and A_p and show this map is isomorphism.
But my idea didnot work right now. Please give me some help.
In addition, How to show the number of subgroups of A of order p equals the number of
subgroups of A of index p.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a theorem: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finitely_generated_abelian_group"
which states that every finite Abelian group can be decomposed into the direct product of groups of prime order (any group of prime order is cyclic btw).
Let's look at the subgroup [tex]A_p[/tex]. The order of each [tex]x\in A_p[/tex] must be p, it's clear that it can't be larger than p, and because p is prime it can't be smaller either. If the order of x is r which is smaller than p, then r must be a divisor of p, but p is prime.
Clearly, every element of A with order p is included in [tex]A_p[/tex].
And we have:
[tex]A_p=P_1 P_2... P_n[/tex] where every [tex]P_i[/tex] is a cyclic group of order p and n is the number of times that these groups occur in the decomposition of A.
Let's look at the subgroup [tex]A^p[/tex], if [tex]A^p\bigcap A_p\neq\{e\}[/tex] then [tex]\exists x\in A_p,\ \ x=y^p[/tex] and then [tex]\exists y,[/tex] with order [tex]p^2[/tex].
But then let's look at the subgroup generated by various power of y. this is a cyclic group of order [tex]p^2[/tex] and as every other abelian group can be decomposed into a product of two order p cyclic groups. so [tex]y=hg[/tex] where both h and g have order p. but hg must also have an order p in that case. and so we have that the order of y is p, and thus
[tex]A^p\bigcap A_p=\{e\}[/tex] . If we look at the homomorphism:
[tex]\phi :A \rightarrow A^p \ \ \ \ \phi (a)=a^p[/tex]
the kernel of this homomorphism is clearly [tex]A_p[/tex] and we have:
[tex]im(\phi) \cong A/ker(\phi)\ \ \Rightarrow \ \ A^p \cong A/A_p[/tex]
now we have enough information to conclude that A is decomposed into the product of [tex]A_P[/tex] and [tex]A^p[/tex] which answers both parts of your question!
During the proof there was ambiguity between semi-direct product and direct product of subgroups but when it comes to abelian groups the two are the same up to isomorphisms.
I am absolutely certain that the proof contains a lot of unnecessary stuff and can be simplified so good luck, and I hope I got the main idea through.

P.S. You can also say that let [tex]A=P_1 P_2...P_n Q_1 Q2...Q_m...Z_1...Z_l[/tex] be the decomposition of A into cyclic groups of prime order where each two groups with the same letter have the same order. Then the product of all these groups with the [tex]P_1...P_n[/tex] left out should be isomorphic to [tex]A^p[/tex], the reason for this being that taking the p-th power of each element is an isomorphism because p is not a divisor of any of the orders of the elements in this subgroup.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K