Finite Potential Well Solutions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the finite square well problem using the stationary Schrödinger equation. The general solutions for the wave function in the three regions are defined as: region I: ##\psi_{\text{I}}= Ae^{\kappa x}##, region II: ##\psi_{\text{II}}= C \cos(k x) + D\sin(kx)##, and region III: ##\psi_{\text{III}}= Be^{-\kappa x}##. The boundary conditions lead to two equations that relate the coefficients A, B, C, and D. The discussion highlights the necessity of setting ##D=0## for even solutions and ##C=0## for odd solutions, emphasizing the symmetry properties of cosine and sine functions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the stationary Schrödinger equation
  • Familiarity with boundary conditions in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of even and odd functions in mathematics
  • Basic concepts of wave functions and potential wells
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of boundary conditions in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the properties of even and odd functions in relation to wave functions
  • Learn about the finite square well potential and its applications
  • Investigate the mathematical derivation of the Schrödinger equation solutions
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, physicists analyzing potential wells, and anyone studying wave function behavior in quantum systems.

71GA
Messages
208
Reaction score
0
Lets say we have a finite square well symetric around ##y## axis (picture below).

screenshot-from-2013-03-.png


I know how and why general solutions to the second order ODE (stationary Schrödinger equation) are as follows for the regions I, II and III.

\begin{align}
\text{I:}& & \psi_{\text{I}}&= Ae^{\kappa x} \\
\text{III:}& & \psi_{\text{III}}&= Be^{-\kappa x} \\
\text{II:}& & \psi_{\text{II}}&= C \cos(k x) + D\sin(kx)
\end{align}

But now i got to a point where i have to start applying a boundary conditions to get a speciffic solution. So i start with the 1st boundary condition which is ##\psi_{\text{I}}\left(-\frac{d}{2}\right)=\psi_{\text{II}}\left(-\frac{d}{2}\right)## for the left potential shift and ##\psi_{\text{II}}\left(\frac{d}{2}\right)=\psi_{\text{III}}\left(\frac{d}{2}\right)## for the right potential shift. These leave me with a system of 2 equations (one for left and one for right potential shift):

\begin{align}
{\scriptsize\text{left potential shift:}}& & Ae^{-\kappa \frac{d}{2}} &= C \cos\left(k\tfrac{d}{2}\right) - D\sin\left(k \tfrac{d}{2}\right)\\
{\scriptsize \text{right potential shift:}}& & Be^{-\kappa \frac{d}{2}} &= C \cos\left(k\tfrac{d}{2}\right) + D\sin\left(k \tfrac{d}{2}\right)\\
\end{align}

Question 1:
From here on authors of most books don't seem to explain much. Most of them only say that we must use ##\boxed{D\!=\!0}## to solve for even solutions and ##\boxed{C\!=\!0}## to solve for *odd solutions*. What is this argument based on?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
71GA said:
From here on authors of most books don't seem to explain much. Most of them only say that we must use ##\boxed{C\!=\!0}## to solve for even solutions and ##\boxed{D\!=\!0}## to solve for *odd solutions*. What is this argument based on?

How is cos(x) related to cos(-x) and how is sin(x) related to sin(-x)?

(apologies in advance if I've missed the point of your question)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K