Energies and numbers of bound states in finite potential well

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of the equation for the number of bound states, N, in a finite potential well, expressed as N ≈ (√(2m W_p) d) / (ħ π). The constants defined are ℓ = √(2mW/ħ²) and K = √(2m(W_p - W)/ħ²), which relate to the transcendental equations for odd and even solutions of the potential well. The periodicity of the tangent function is highlighted, specifically how tan(√(W)) relates to the intervals of W where it equals k²π², providing insight into the behavior of bound states.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics concepts, specifically potential wells
  • Familiarity with the Schrödinger equation and its applications
  • Knowledge of periodic functions, particularly the tangent function
  • Basic grasp of mathematical constants such as ħ (reduced Planck's constant)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Schrödinger equation for finite potential wells
  • Explore the implications of transcendental equations in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the properties of periodic functions and their applications in physics
  • Investigate the role of boundary conditions in determining bound states
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists studying potential wells, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum states.

71GA
Messages
208
Reaction score
0
Hello I understand how to approach finite potential well. However i am disturbed by equation which describes number of states ##N## for a finite potential well (##d## is a width of a well and ##W_p## is potential):
$$
N \approx \dfrac{\sqrt{2m W_p}d}{\hbar \pi}
$$
I am sure it has something to do with one of the constants ##\mathcal L## or ##\mathcal K## defined this way:
\begin{align}
\mathcal L &\equiv \sqrt{\tfrac{2mW}{\hbar^2}} & \mathcal{K}&\equiv \sqrt{ \tfrac{ 2m(W_p-W) }{ \hbar^2 }}
\end{align}
and the transcendental equations for ODD and EVEN solutions:
\begin{align}
&\frac{\mathcal K}{\mathcal L} = \tan \left(\mathcal L \tfrac{d}{2}\right) &&-\frac{\mathcal L}{\mathcal K} = \tan \left(\mathcal L \tfrac{d}{2}\right)\\
&\scriptsize{\text{transc. eq. - EVEN}} &&\scriptsize{\text{transc. eq. - ODD}}
\end{align}

QUESTION: Could anyoe tell me where does 1st equation come from? I mean ##\tan(W)## repeats every ##\pi##, but if i insert ##\mathcal L## in transcendental equation i have ##\tan(\sqrt{W})##! On what intervals does the latter repeat itself? Does this has something to do with it? It sure looks like it... Please help me to synthisize all this in my head.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
71GA said:
QUESTION: Could anyoe tell me where does 1st equation come from? I mean ##\tan(W)## repeats every ##\pi##, but if i insert ##\mathcal L## in transcendental equation i have ##\tan(\sqrt{W})##! On what intervals does the latter repeat itself?
It's a strange question, I'm not sure to have understood it.
tan(x) is periodic with period = π; it means, for example, that tan(W) = 0 for: W = kπ where k is an integer; if it's tan(√(W)) = 0 it means that √(W) = kπ → W = k2π2.
 
lightarrow said:
It's a strange question, I'm not sure to have understood it.
tan(x) is periodic with period = π; it means, for example, that tan(W) = 0 for: W = kπ where k is an integer; if it's tan(√(W)) = 0 it means that √(W) = kπ → W = k2π2.

This did help. Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K