Fire in Low Gravity: Visualizing a Biodome Blaze

AI Thread Summary
In low gravity environments, fire behaves differently than on Earth due to reduced convection and oxygen inflow. Flames are expected to be softer and more rounded, resembling the behavior of a candle flame but on a larger scale. Wildfires would not occur in the same way; instead, fires would burn slowly with unique patterns, such as a ring of flames around a central area that may remain unburned. The visual representation of fire in low gravity is challenging to conceptualize, as existing media often inaccurately depict flames in zero gravity. Overall, understanding fire dynamics in low gravity is crucial for safety and design in space habitats.
jaidanwolf
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi there, I've seen videos and simulations of fire in zero or microgravity, but I'm trying to get a mental picture of how fire would look / burn in LOW gravity. Say a space station that rotates in order to create a light gravitational hold equivalent to the moon or even Mars...if a fire was ravaging a biodome within that station, what would the fire itself look and move like? I assume it wouldn't behave the same as a burning house on Earth would, but since there is SOME gravity, it also won't just be the contained blue fire bubble you see in zero or microgravity. I'm trying to imagine something in between but any thoughts to help me visualize such a scenario would be appreciated!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I imagine it would soft and rounded but still climbing upward, though gently. Imagine the shape and behavior of the flame of candle, but scale it up. Better yet, ever seen what happens when you let a match burn so it has multiple peaks?

Picture this, but scaled up.

I am only guessing, BTW, I know no better than you.

Matches_stretch-2.jpg
 
Thanks for the thought. Guessing is more than welcome! I'm definitely able to picture it on a smaller scale, like the candles, but I'm having a lot of trouble picturing what a whole house or even village burning in low gravity would look like. Like you said, it would probably be rounded and not billowing quite the way it does here. You see zero gravity fire in movies all the time except it is totally unrealistic...they just make it look like a normal fire but surrounded by little balls of flame drifting around (like water does) and that is, while pretty to see from an effects standpoint, not remotely accurate. Obviously, a low gravity rather than zero gravity environment would be a bit of a cross betwee the two. But since I've only seen single candles or matches in zero gravity, trying to get a mental image of a wildfire in moon or Mars gravity is proving difficult!
 
 
jaidanwolf said:
... trying to get a mental image of a wildfire in moon or Mars gravity is proving difficult!
There's a reason for that.

In low gravity, a dramatically reduced convection system means a dramatically reduced inflow of oxygen. This means that fires just do not burn anywhere near as actively in a low-G environment.

You simply won't have wildfires.Sure, a field of grass would burn, but slowly, and I expect you'd see a very different burn pattern, for example, the centre might be completely burned out. You might get a ring of slow-burn around the perimeter, with just coals in the centre region.
 
Last edited:

Attachments

  • video.jpg
    video.jpg
    31.6 KB · Views: 569
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top