Firefighter sliding down pole onto spring

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a physics problem involving a firefighter sliding down a pole onto a spring-supported platform. The firefighter, weighing 80.5 kg, experiences a constant frictional force of 300 N while descending from a height of 3.25 m. The correct speed just before impact is calculated to be 6.28 m/s, while the maximum spring compression is determined to be 0.987 m, after accounting for gravitational potential energy and frictional forces during the descent.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Knowledge of conservation of momentum
  • Familiarity with conservation of mechanical energy principles
  • Basic concepts of spring mechanics, including Hooke's Law
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the effects of friction on energy conservation in mechanical systems
  • Learn about the application of conservation of momentum in inelastic collisions
  • Explore the relationship between gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy
  • Investigate the dynamics of spring compression and energy storage
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to energy conservation and motion dynamics.

doneky
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 80.5 kg firefighter slides down a pole while a constant frictional force of 300 N retards her motion. A horizontal 20.0 kg platform is supported by a spring at the bottom of the pole to cushion the fall. The firefighter starts from rest 3.25 m above the platform, and the spring constant is 4000 N/m.

(a) Find the firefighter's speed just before she collides with the platform.

(b) Find the maximum distance the spring is compressed. (Assume the frictional force acts during the entire motion, and the spring is not compressed before the collision.)

Homework Equations


U=mgh
K=1/2mv^2
Wspr=1/2kx^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I easily found (a), the answer is 6.28 m/s. I cannot understand why (b) isn't right, though. I found the speed of the combined platform and firefighter after collision (5.03 m/s) through conservation of momentum. However, I try to plug this into another conservation of energy equation and it just doesn't work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
doneky said:
I easily found (a), the answer is 6.28 m/s. I cannot understand why (b) isn't right, though. I found the speed of the combined platform and firefighter after collision (5.03 m/s) through conservation of momentum. However, I try to plug this into another conservation of energy equation and it just doesn't work.

We're not psychic, we can't find errors if you don't show us precisely what you've done. Please show your your work in detail.
 
gneill said:
We're not psychic, we can't find errors if you don't show us precisely what you've done. Please show your your work in detail.
Haha, sorry, trying to study for a midterm and so I just quickly wrote this post before moving to the next problem.

My answer to part (a) is correct, and the velocity right before impact is 6.28 m/s. I applied conservation of momentum to find the combined velocities.

m1v1 + (0) = (m1v)f + (m2v)f [f = final, the velocities after are exactly the same because they "stick"]
m1v1/(m1+m2) = v = 5.03 m/s

Then I applied conservation of mechanical energy, because there are no non-conservative forces.
KEi + PEi = KEf + PEf
There is no initial potential energy, and there is no final kinetic energy.
KEi = PEf
(1/2)mv^2 = (1/2)kx^2
From this I get x = .7 something, but the answer is 0.987 m.

Why is this wrong? I'm getting the feeling it's the spring force part.
 
I don't see where you've taken into account the friction that's still acting, nor the change in gravitational potential energy as the mass descends while the spring compresses.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Biker
gneill said:
I don't see where you've taken into account the friction that's still acting, nor the change in gravitational potential energy as the mass descends while the spring compresses.
Oh, I'm an idiot. I forgot gravity, and in addition I misread the problem. I thought that it was saying the friction didn't apply at all for part B. Whoops.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
19K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K