MHB First fundamental theorem of Calculus

Click For Summary
The First Fundamental Theorem of Calculus states that if a function \( f \) is integrable on \([a,b]\) and \( F(x) = \int_a^x f(t) dt \), then \( F \) is differentiable at points where \( f \) is continuous, with \( F'(x_0) = f(x_0) \). An example is provided with a piecewise function \( f(x) \) that is not continuous at \( x = 0 \), leading to \( F(x) = |x| - 1 \). The differentiability of \( F \) at \( 0 \) fails because the left-hand and right-hand limits of the derivative do not match, resulting in a non-existent limit. This illustrates the importance of continuity in the application of the theorem.
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! :)

I am looking at the theorem:
"$f:[a,b] \to \mathbb{R}$ integrable
We suppose the function $F:[a,b] \to \mathbb{R}$ with $F(x)=\int_a^x f$.If $x_0$ a point where $f$ is continuous $\Rightarrow F$ is integrable at $ x_0$ and $F'(x_0)=f(x_0)$".

There is a remark that the theorem stands only if $f$ is continuous and there is the following example:

$f(x)=\left\{\begin{matrix}
-1,-1 \leq x \leq 0\\
1,0 < x \leq 1
\end{matrix}\right.$
which is not continuous at $0$.
Then,according to the textbook, the function $F(x)$ is equal to $|x|-1$..But,why is it like that??And also why is $F$ not differentiable at $0$?? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well on the intervals [-1,0] and (0,1] $f$ is constant, so it doesn't matter which points you pick for the Riemann sums you get:

[math]\int_{-1}^x f(t)\ dt = -x - 1[/math] for $x \in [-1,0]$

[math]\int_0^x f(t)\ dt = x[/math] for $x \in (0,1]$

(I urge you to actually calculate these Riemann sums).

From these integrals, we see that for $x \in [0,1]$:

[math]\int_{-1}^x f(t)\ dt = \int_{-1}^0 f(t)\ dt + \int_0^x f(t)\ dt = -1 + x[/math],

so that in all cases, $F(x) = |x| - 1$.

The problem with the differentiability of $F$ is in trying to determine $F'(0)$, we have:

[math]\lim_{h \to 0^-} \frac{F(0+h) - F(0)}{h}[/math]

[math] = \lim_{h \to 0^-} \frac{[-(0+h) - 1] - (0 - 1)}{h}[/math]

[math] = \lim_{h \to 0^-} \frac{-h}{h} = -1[/math]

whereas:

[math]\lim_{h \to 0^+} \frac{F(0+h) - F(0)}{h}[/math]

[math] = \lim_{h \to 0^+} \frac{[(0+h) - 1] - (0 - 1)}{h}[/math]

[math] = \lim_{h \to 0^+} \frac{h}{h} = 1[/math],

so this limit does not exist.
 
Deveno said:
Well on the intervals [-1,0] and (0,1] $f$ is constant, so it doesn't matter which points you pick for the Riemann sums you get:

[math]\int_{-1}^x f(t)\ dt = -x - 1[/math] for $x \in [-1,0]$

[math]\int_0^x f(t)\ dt = x[/math] for $x \in (0,1]$

(I urge you to actually calculate these Riemann sums).

From these integrals, we see that for $x \in [0,1]$:

[math]\int_{-1}^x f(t)\ dt = \int_{-1}^0 f(t)\ dt + \int_0^x f(t)\ dt = -1 + x[/math],

so that in all cases, $F(x) = |x| - 1$.

The problem with the differentiability of $F$ is in trying to determine $F'(0)$, we have:

[math]\lim_{h \to 0^-} \frac{F(0+h) - F(0)}{h}[/math]

[math] = \lim_{h \to 0^-} \frac{[-(0+h) - 1] - (0 - 1)}{h}[/math]

[math] = \lim_{h \to 0^-} \frac{-h}{h} = -1[/math]

whereas:

[math]\lim_{h \to 0^+} \frac{F(0+h) - F(0)}{h}[/math]

[math] = \lim_{h \to 0^+} \frac{[(0+h) - 1] - (0 - 1)}{h}[/math]

[math] = \lim_{h \to 0^+} \frac{h}{h} = 1[/math],

so this limit does not exist.

I understand..Thanks a lot! (Nod)
 
Thread 'Problem with calculating projections of curl using rotation of contour'
Hello! I tried to calculate projections of curl using rotation of coordinate system but I encountered with following problem. Given: ##rot_xA=\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial z}=0## ##rot_yA=\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial x}=1## ##rot_zA=\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial y}=0## I rotated ##yz##-plane of this coordinate system by an angle ##45## degrees about ##x##-axis and used rotation matrix to...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K