First Grade Math: Unconventional Solutions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheOldHag
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the unconventional teaching methods in elementary mathematics, specifically the "Everyday Math" curriculum. A parent expresses frustration after their daughter was marked wrong for demonstrating the commutativity of addition (4 + 5 = 9 and 5 + 4 = 9) without using prescribed visual aids like circles and sticks. This incident raises concerns about the effectiveness of current math education in the U.S. and its impact on students' understanding of fundamental concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic arithmetic operations, particularly addition.
  • Familiarity with the concept of commutativity in mathematics.
  • Knowledge of the "Everyday Math" curriculum and its teaching methodologies.
  • Awareness of educational philosophies influencing math instruction.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles and criticisms of the "Everyday Math" curriculum.
  • Explore the concept of commutativity in more advanced mathematical contexts.
  • Read "Lockhart's Lament" to understand critiques of contemporary math education.
  • Investigate alternative math teaching methods and their effectiveness in various educational systems.
USEFUL FOR

Parents, educators, and curriculum developers interested in understanding the implications of modern math teaching methods and their effects on student learning outcomes.

TheOldHag
Messages
44
Reaction score
3
I think I just had a confrontation with new math. My daughter was asked to show two ways of solving the problem 4 + 5. Naturally, she put

4 + 5 = 9
5 + 4 = 9

To me, this demonstrates commutativity of addition, which is fundamental to arithmetic. Beside that, she is at the point where adding such small number is automatic.

Well, she got the question wrong because she didn't draw circles in squares in one instance and sticks in another instance.

Is this why America lags behind the rest of the world mathematically? I've always thought of myself as a liberal. Is this liberalism gone off a cliff?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
TheOldHag said:
I think I just had a confrontation with new math. My daughter was asked to show two ways of solving the problem 4 + 5. Naturally, she put

4 + 5 = 9
5 + 4 = 9

To me, this demonstrates commutativity of addition, which is fundamental to arithmetic. Beside that, she is at the point where adding such small number is automatic.

Well, she got the question wrong because she didn't draw circles in squares in one instance and sticks in another instance.

Is this why America lags behind the rest of the world mathematically? I've always thought of myself as a liberal. Is this liberalism gone off a cliff?

Thats ludicrous are you seriously telling me that they marked her wrong for answering that way? Did you contact the teacher ?
 
I suggested to my wife it may be a good idea to mention it. But I think this is part of some wider philosophy on how to teach mathematics that is probably not informed by real mathematicians.
 
Stupid, how is drawing two different sets of symbols two different methods?
 
In these instances, I am always reminded of "Lockhart's Lament"

It is somewhat long, but very well worth the read.

Incidentally, I was also reminded of this in the "Should we teach elementary math" thread, which was somewhat abruptly closed before I was able to post it.

Edit For Clarity:
I think that your child's math teacher is probably following some very basic manual. The teacher may not even be aware (or remember) that the integers form a ring, and so are commutative. etc, etc.

I find it very sad.
 
Last edited:
I just found that the proper term for this sort of math is Everyday Math. Great way to catch up with the rest of the word - teach math as a series of disjoint circle and block games. What a joke.
 
TheOldHag said:
Well, she got the question wrong because she didn't draw circles in squares in one instance and sticks in another instance.

LOL

Hahaha. That's a good one.
 
I've bookmarked "Lockhart's Lament". Looks like a good read.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
13K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
16K
Replies
39
Views
9K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
12K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K