First isomorphism theorem for rings

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on demonstrating that the mapping defined by \(\sum ai xi \to (a0, \sum ai)\) is a ring homomorphism from \(C[x]\) to \(C \times C\). Participants analyze the first isomorphism theorem to establish an isomorphism from \(C[x]/(x(x-1))\) to \(C \times C\), where \((x(x-1))\) is the principal ideal generated by \(p = x(x-1)\). The conversation also addresses whether \(C[x]/(x(x-1))\) qualifies as an integral domain, with insights into the kernel of the homomorphism.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ring homomorphisms
  • Familiarity with the first isomorphism theorem
  • Knowledge of principal ideals in polynomial rings
  • Concept of integral domains in ring theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of ring homomorphisms in detail
  • Explore the first isomorphism theorem applications in algebra
  • Investigate principal ideal domains (PIDs) and their characteristics
  • Examine the conditions for a quotient ring to be an integral domain
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebra students, and educators interested in ring theory, particularly those studying homomorphisms and isomorphisms in polynomial rings.

Kate2010
Messages
134
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have to show that \sum ai xi -> (a0 \sum ai) is a ring homomorphism from C[x] to C x C

I then have to use the first isomorphism theorem to show that there is an isomorphism from C[x]/ (x(x-1)) to C x C where (x(x-1)) is the principal ideal (p) generated by the element p=x(x-1) of C[x]

It then asks is C[x]/(x(x-1)) an integral domain.

Homework Equations



First isomorphism theorem

The Attempt at a Solution



I think I may have done the first part but I'm a little unsure if my notation/understanding is fully correct, considering multiplication can I say f((\sum ai xi)(\sum bj xj) = f (\sum (aibj) xk) {summing over i+j=k} = (a0,\sumai)(bo,\sumbj) = f(\sum ai xi) f(\sum bj xj)

I'm more stuck on the second part. I think I am aiming to show that ker f = (x(x-1))

ker f = {a0 + a1x + ... + anxn : a0 = 0, a1 + ... +an = 0}
= {x (a1 + ... + anxn-1) : a1+ ... +an =0}

Now I thought about trying to pull out a factor of x-1 but I don't think that would work?
I can see that x(x-1) does satisfy that there is no constant term and the sum of ai is 0 but I don't see how to get that all polynomials multiplied by it do.

Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kate2010 said:
I'm more stuck on the second part. I think I am aiming to show that ker f = (x(x-1))

ker f = {a0 + a1x + ... + anxn : a0 = 0, a1 + ... +an = 0}
= {x (a1 + ... + anxn-1) : a1+ ... +an =0}

Now I thought about trying to pull out a factor of x-1 but I don't think that would work?
I can see that x(x-1) does satisfy that there is no constant term and the sum of ai is 0 but I don't see how to get that all polynomials multiplied by it do.

Since you know that 1 is a root of the polynomial a1x + ... + an x^(n-1), x-1 will divide it.

Alternatively, you know that x(x-1) must generate the entire ideal because C[x] is a PID and so ker f is generated by any element of lowest degree (and clearly there cannot be an element in ker f of degree less than 2 since 0 and 1 are both roots).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K