First law of thermodynamics, mass/energy in the Universe

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the reconciliation of the first law of thermodynamics, which states that matter cannot be created or destroyed, with the Big Bang theory. It highlights that the law of conservation of energy does not apply to the universe as a whole, making the question of the origin of mass/energy irrelevant on a cosmological scale. The second law of thermodynamics indicates that entropy in the universe can only increase, and examples are provided to illustrate how entropy behaves in isolated systems. The conversation concludes that our current models do not address the transition from nothing to something, thus eliminating the need for a conservation law in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the first law of thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with the second law of thermodynamics
  • Basic knowledge of the Big Bang theory
  • Concept of entropy in isolated systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the law of conservation of energy in cosmology
  • Study the relationship between entropy and the expansion of the universe
  • Explore models of the universe before the Big Bang
  • Investigate the concept of local versus global conservation laws in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, cosmologists, students of thermodynamics, and anyone interested in the fundamental laws governing the universe and its origins.

girts
Messages
185
Reaction score
22
Ok, so just a quick question, first law of thermodynamics basically states that matter cannot be created nor destroyed aka it can only change states and turn into energy or vice versa, the second law states that, IIRC, for perfect isolated systems entropy remains constant but for our universe entropy can only increase not decrease, so given this information how can we reconcile these two laws with our current best theory about the origins of the universe which is the "Big Bang" theory?

Also given the fact that physical laws and our means of "seeing" in the past like EM radiation itself arose only after or with the big bang, will we ever be able with scientific experimental certainty tell how these laws go together with how the universe began, taking also into account the fact that we cannot determine the total size of the universe due to it's accelerated expansion?I have heard that typically we don't apply the first law to the universe, but if so does it help us much? because we know for a fact that the universe aka space-time comes together with a certain amount of mass/energy that we can observe within the universe so with or without the first law applied to cosmological scale do we have or will we ever have any certain knowledge of exactly where all this mass/energy came from?
 
Science news on Phys.org
girts said:
with or without the first law applied to cosmological scale do we have or will we ever have any certain knowledge of exactly where all this mass/energy came from?
The law of conservation of energy does not apply to the universe as a whole. It is a local conservation law. With no conservation law to use, the question of "where did it come from" does not arise. It does not have to come from anywhere -- it's not conserved.

If one restricts one's attention to a local patch of space-time, one can ask "where did did the energy in that patch it come from". But the answer is simple -- it was either already there or it crossed the boundary into our patch. Our model of the universe does not extend to a time before the universe existed. It does not cover a transition from nothing to something. So again, there is no problem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale
girts said:
the second law states that, IIRC, for perfect isolated systems entropy remains constant but for our universe entropy can only increase not decrease

The entropy of an isolated system can increase. Suppose we have a cubical isolated container with volume of ##1m^3##, and containing an ideal gas that is for some reason all located in one half of the cube at the initial state. In a quite short time after the initial moment, the gas will be distributed to fill the whole cube evenly, while its temperature is the same as initially because expanding to vacuum does not consume energy and the temperature of an ideal gas depends only on the internal energy and number of moles. Now, as the gas is occupying a larger volume, its entropy has to definitely be larger than initially, because there's no temperature drop that would counteract the effect of the volume change on entropy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 100 ·
4
Replies
100
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K