First-Order Linear Differential Problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving an initial value problem (IVP) involving a first-order linear differential equation represented in matrix form. The participants are exploring eigenvalues and particular solutions related to the system defined by the matrix and the input vector.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of eigenvalues for the matrix and the form of the complementary solution. There is an ongoing debate about the correct approach to finding the particular solution, with suggestions for different forms of X_p being proposed.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants questioning the correctness of their calculations and assumptions regarding the eigenvalues and the form of the particular solution. Some guidance has been offered, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach to finding X_p.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information they can use or the methods they can apply. There is uncertainty regarding the correctness of the eigenvalue calculations and the proposed forms for the particular solution.

Hiche
Messages
82
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Solve the following IVP:

X' = \begin{pmatrix}2 & -1\\3 & -2\end{pmatrix}X + \begin{pmatrix}0\\t\end{pmatrix} with X(0) = \begin{pmatrix}1\\0\end{pmatrix}

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



The eigenvalue corresponding to \begin{pmatrix}2 & -1\\3 & -2\end{pmatrix} is \lambda = 0. We find that X_c = c_1\begin{pmatrix}1\\2\end{pmatrix} e^{0t}. Now in order to find X_p, how exactly is the right way? I took X_p = \begin{pmatrix}a_1\\b_1\end{pmatrix}t and wanted to find a_1 and b_1. Right or wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Hiche! :smile:
Hiche said:
The eigenvalue corresponding to \begin{pmatrix}2 & -1\\3 & -2\end{pmatrix} is \lambda = 0.

Nooo :redface:
 
oh, crap! Apparently, 3 * 1 = 4 -_-

So, again, the eigenvalues are \lambda_1 = -1 and \lambda_2 = 1. I hope this is correct. So the solution of X_c = c_1\begin{pmatrix}1\\1\end{pmatrix}e^t + c_2\begin{pmatrix}1\\3\end{pmatrix}e^{-t}.

Now about X_p. Is my method correct (first post)?
 
Hiche said:
Now in order to find X_p, how exactly is the right way? I took X_p = \begin{pmatrix}a_1\\b_1\end{pmatrix}t and wanted to find a_1 and b_1. Right or wrong?

(i'm not sure, but…) i'd be inclined to go for X_p = \begin{pmatrix}a_0\\b_0\end{pmatrix} + \begin{pmatrix}a_1\\b_1\end{pmatrix}t
 
Okay, so upon a little work, X_p = \begin{pmatrix}1\\2\end{pmatrix}t and the general solution is X = X_c + X_p

Thank you, tiny-tim.
 
But X_p = \begin{pmatrix}1\\2\end{pmatrix}t isn't a solution …

Xp' = (1,2), and Xp(0) = (0,0)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K