Fixed end beams-Direction of moment

  • Thread starter Thread starter socrates_1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moment
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the direction of moments (clockwise or anticlockwise) for fixed end beams, specifically referencing Dr. Colin Caprani's diagrams. Participants note that the direction of moments is towards the side of the beam that is compressed. Confusion arises from the inconsistency in sign conventions used in the diagrams, with some adhering to the mathematicians' convention of anticlockwise moments being positive, while others follow the engineering convention. The need for clear sign conventions in such diagrams is emphasized to avoid misunderstandings.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fixed end beam mechanics
  • Familiarity with moment sign conventions in engineering
  • Knowledge of free body diagrams
  • Basic principles of structural analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between mathematicians' and engineers' moment sign conventions
  • Study fixed end beam analysis techniques
  • Learn how to construct and interpret free body diagrams
  • Explore examples of moment calculations in structural engineering
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, civil engineering students, and anyone involved in analyzing fixed end beams and understanding moment direction in structural mechanics.

socrates_1
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hi,I am trying to find out how to decide the direction of moment (clockwise or anticlockwise) for a fixed end beam (for example).
As far as I know the direction is towards the side of the beam which is compressed.

The link below shows some examples with directions of moments.
Can someone explain to me why the directions are like this?

http://www.colincaprani.com/files/notes/SAIV/SAIV - Exam Handout.pdf
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
socrates_1 said:
The link below shows some examples with directions of moments.
Can someone explain to me why the directions are like this?

http://www.colincaprani.com/files/notes/SAIV/SAIV - Exam Handout.pdf

:eek::eek::eek: What a horribly confusing set of diagrams! :eek::eek::eek:

He doesn't say whether the M's are meant to be the reactions, or the moments on the end of the beam in a free body diagram.

And the arrows seems to be showing the direction of the actual (positive) moments, not a consistent sign convention.

There seem to be too many "unknowns" to "explain" exactly what the author meant, but those statements should point you in the direction of figuring out something that YOU understand (which is more important in than trying to second guess the author, IMO)
 
Any such table should be accompanied by a clear set of sign conventions.

Presumabably Dr Caprani is using the same ones taught on your course?

It rather looks as though Dr C is using the mathematicians and programmers reverse convention of anticlockwise moments positive and clockwise moments negative at any point.

This is different from the usual engineering convention that would refer to a short length of beam with two moments (one at each end) with the convention that if the pair generates hogging or sagging moments in the section they are positive or negative (or the other way round).

This alternative convention leads to MA and MB having the same sign in the first three entries in your table, unlike the mathematicians convention.

Note, however, you reported difficulty with some entries but did not say which ones?
 
Last edited:
He shouldn't have put a negative sign on those moments on the right-hand-side. The moments shown on the diagrams are the reactions, and are positive as drawn.
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
42
Views
27K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K