I Fixing CP phases to cancel CKM phases

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between CP invariance in the weak sector and the CKM matrix phases. It establishes that the condition for CP invariance involves the CKM matrix elements and arbitrary phases from CP-transformed fields. There are nine parameters in the CKM matrix, consisting of three angles and six phases, but only five independent CP phases can be fixed due to the presence of two global symmetries: baryon number and electric charge. This limitation implies that one CKM phase remains unaccounted for, preventing the condition from being satisfied. The discussion concludes that the global symmetries restrict the number of CP phases available for cancellation.
Siupa
Messages
30
Reaction score
5
When we try to see if the weak sector is CP invariant, we CP transform all the fields in the charged interactions terms and we get a condition involving the elements of the CKM matrix and the arbitrary phases of the CP transformed fields:
$$V_{ij} = V^*_{ij} \, e^{i(\xi_W + \phi_{d_j} - \phi_{u_i})}$$
Then, the argument goes: there are 9 parameters in V_CKM because it is a general 3x3 unitary matrix. These 9 parameters are split in 3 "angles" and 6 phases, the 3 angles being the ones you get if you restrict to an element of ##\text{SO}(3)##.

To make the above condition hold, we need to fix the CP phases to cancel the 6 CKM phases. We have 7 CP phases (1 from W, 3 from the downs and 3 from the ups), so it seems like we can do it.

But then we say "actually we have only 5 independent CP phases, because there are 2 residual global symmetries corresponding to baryon number and electric charge". Therefore, 1 phase remains in the CKM and the condition can never hold.

I don't understand the last point: why does the presence of ##\text{U}(1)_\text{B}## and ##\text{U}(1)_\text{Q}## global symmetries reduces the number of CP phases I can fix to cancel the CKM phases?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can use two of those phases to be included in your U(1)B and U(1)Q global transformations of your fields (one for each transformation)
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Some confusion with the Binding Energy graph of atoms'
My question is about the following graph: I keep on reading that fusing atoms up until Fe-56 doesn’t cost energy and only releases binding energy. However, I understood that fusing atoms also require energy to overcome the positive charges of the protons. Where does that energy go after fusion? Does it go into the mass of the newly fused atom, escape as heat or is the released binding energy shown in the graph actually the net energy after subtracting the required fusion energy? I...