I Fixing CP phases to cancel CKM phases

Siupa
Messages
30
Reaction score
5
When we try to see if the weak sector is CP invariant, we CP transform all the fields in the charged interactions terms and we get a condition involving the elements of the CKM matrix and the arbitrary phases of the CP transformed fields:
$$V_{ij} = V^*_{ij} \, e^{i(\xi_W + \phi_{d_j} - \phi_{u_i})}$$
Then, the argument goes: there are 9 parameters in V_CKM because it is a general 3x3 unitary matrix. These 9 parameters are split in 3 "angles" and 6 phases, the 3 angles being the ones you get if you restrict to an element of ##\text{SO}(3)##.

To make the above condition hold, we need to fix the CP phases to cancel the 6 CKM phases. We have 7 CP phases (1 from W, 3 from the downs and 3 from the ups), so it seems like we can do it.

But then we say "actually we have only 5 independent CP phases, because there are 2 residual global symmetries corresponding to baryon number and electric charge". Therefore, 1 phase remains in the CKM and the condition can never hold.

I don't understand the last point: why does the presence of ##\text{U}(1)_\text{B}## and ##\text{U}(1)_\text{Q}## global symmetries reduces the number of CP phases I can fix to cancel the CKM phases?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can use two of those phases to be included in your U(1)B and U(1)Q global transformations of your fields (one for each transformation)
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Back
Top